Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372808›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Human disease prediction from microbiome data by multiple feature fusion and deep learning.

Xingjian Chen, Zifan Zhu, Weitong Zhang, Yuchen Wang, Fuzhou Wang, Jianyi Yang, Ka-Chun Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xingjian ChenDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Zifan ZhuQuantitative and Computational Biology Program, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Weitong ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Yuchen WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Fuzhou WangDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.
Jianyi YangSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Ka-Chun WongDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human disease prediction from microbiome data has broad implications in metagenomics. It is rare for the existing methods to consider abundance profiles from both known and unknown microbial organisms, or capture the taxonomic relationships among microbial taxa, leading to significant information loss. On the other hand, deep learning has shown unprecedented advantages in classification tasks for its feature-learning ability. However, it encounters the opposite situation in metagenome-based disease prediction since high-dimensional low-sample-size metagenomic datasets can lead to severe overfitting; and black-box model fails in providing biological explanations. To circumvent the related problems, we developed MetaDR, a comprehensive machine learning-based framework that integrates various information and deep learning to predict human diseases. Experimental results indicate that MetaDR achieves competitive prediction performance with a reduction in running time, and effectively discovers the informative features with biological insights.

Indexed as

Biological sciencesPhysiologySystems biology

Identifiers

PMID35372808
PMCPMC8971930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.