Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372768›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2022

Hospital at Home: another piece of the armoury against COVID-19.

Rebekah Schiff, Maria Oyston, Matthew Quinn, Sharmila Walters, Paul McEnhill, Megan Collins

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Delivery of elective care in the future.Future healthcare journal · 2022
    Article
  15. Making 2022 a learning and reflective year.Future healthcare journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebekah SchiffGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Maria OystonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Matthew QuinnGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sharmila WaltersGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paul McEnhillGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Megan CollinsGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hospital at Home (@Home) services bring the ward to the patient, providing acute care in the home. The @Home team adapted to support the care of patients with COVID-19 in the community who would otherwise have required hospitalisation. Methods: An evidence-based guideline and treatment bundle (dexamethasone, oxygen, intravenous fluids and thromboprophylaxis) for managing severe COVID-19 was developed. Data were retrospectively extracted from notes of patients with COVID-19 admitted between 16 December 2020 to 14 February 2021, and service users contacted for feedback. Results: One-hundred and twenty-five adults with COVID-19 were treated by @Home; 42 severe (34%) and 83 non-severe (66%) infections; average length of stay was 7 days (interquartile range 4-8). Eight-hundred and seventy-five hospital-occupied bed days were saved. Service users emphasised the importance of being with loved ones and the value of respecting peoples' wishes to be at home. Conclusion: @Home gave people with COVID-19 a choice of active treatment at home, thereby extending available healthcare capacity beyond the acute hospital setting.

Indexed as

admission avoidance and urgent care responseCOVID-19hospital at homeolder peoplepatient choice

Identifiers

PMID35372768
PMCPMC8966799
OpenAlexW4210808308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.