Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372767›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2022

Preparing physician associates to prescribe: evidence, educational frameworks and pathways.

Brogan N Guest, Chanceeth Chandrakanthan, Kate Bascombe, Jeannie Watkins

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Corrigendum: Updated declaration of interest.Future healthcare journal · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Making 2022 a learning and reflective year.Future healthcare journal · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brogan N GuestSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Chanceeth ChandrakanthanSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Kate BascombeSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Jeannie WatkinsSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
St George's, University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are approximately 2,850 physician associates (PAs) in the UK, and this number is growing. PAs are unable to prescribe due to an absence of statutory regulation and necessary prescribing legislation. While PAs cannot prescribe, they must have an adequate level of pharmacology knowledge to safely manage patients. There is an expectation that this is taught as part of the core syllabus on PA programmes. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) recently announced the introduction of statutory regulation of Medical Associate Professionals (MAPs) that include PAs under the General Medical Council. With the introduction of regulation, PAs may be able to prescribe as part of their role. A working group is considering how this might be achieved in terms of education and supervision requirements, delivery of the training and scope of practice. This paper explores the current approach to delivering pharmacology across UK PA programmes. We evaluate what constitutes acceptable training and assessment, and determine if programmes have the capacity to prepare students for prescribing rights. We compare UK PA programmes with those in the USA, with the V300 Independent/Supplementary Prescribing course and with the Prescribing Safety Assessment examination.

Indexed as

pharmacologyphysician assistantphysician associateprescribing

Identifiers

PMID35372767
PMCPMC8966800
OpenAlexW4220860085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.