Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372721›Full record

ArticleBrain circulation

Effects of clinical outcomes by modification of patient selection protocol based on premorbid independence for mechanical thrombectomy in older adult patients.

Kota Kurisu, Juro Sakurai, Hajime Wada, Seiji Takebayashi, Tohru Kobayashi, Katsumi Takizawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kota KurisuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Juro SakuraiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Hajime WadaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Seiji TakebayashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Tohru KobayashiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.
Katsumi TakizawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Asahikawa Red Cross Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSince the beneficial effect attained by mechanical thrombectomy (MT) seems to be worse in older than in the younger population, the establishment of an ideal and distinctive patient selection protocol in older is warranted. Herein, we modified our patient selection protocol based on age and premorbid independence in older adult patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 141 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with MT between 2015 and 2020. We started to restrict the indication of MT in very old patients (≥85-year-old) with severe premorbid functional independence (≥modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 3) in 2018. Clinical outcomes before the modification of protocol (period 1) were compared to after (period 2).

resultsAlthough there were no significant differences in median mRS at 90 days and the rates of favorable outcomes (mRS 0-2) between both periods, rates of poor outcomes (mRS 5, 6) significantly decreased (37.3% vs. 19.7%,

conclusionOur modified patient selection protocol in older adults, not only limited by age but also premorbid function, improved the therapeutic outcome of MT. In rapidly aging society, further investigations facilitating a better understanding are necessary to establish an optimal patient selection protocol.

Indexed as

Acute ischemic strokeelderlyendovascular treatmentmechanical thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID35372721
PMCPMC8973453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.