Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372698›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2022

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) may be superior to resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Megan Brenner, Bishoy Zakhary, Raul Coimbra, Jonathan Morrison, Thomas Scalea, Laura J Moore, Jeanette Podbielski, John B Holcomb, Kenji Inaba, Jeremy W Cannon and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Emergency treatment of pelvic ring injuries: state of the art.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Megan BrennerSurgery, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6917-4768
Bishoy ZakharyComparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California, USA.
Raul CoimbraComparative Effectiveness and Clinical Outcomes Research Center, Riverside University Health System, Moreno Valley, California, USA.
Jonathan MorrisonTrauma and Critical Care, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7462-8456
Thomas ScaleaTrauma and Critical Care, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Laura J MooreSurgery, University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jeanette PodbielskiSurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
John B HolcombSurgery, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Kenji InabaSurgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jeremy W CannonSurgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mark SeamonSurgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chance SpaldingTrauma and Acute Care Surgery, Grant Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Charles FoxVascular Surgery, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Ernest E MooreVascular Surgery, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Joseph Abdellatif IbrahimSurgery, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida, USA.
AAST Multi-Institutional Trials Committee
Denver Health Medical Center · USInternational Trauma Anesthesia and Critical Care Society · USRiverside University Health System - Medical Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USGrant Medical Center · USOrlando Regional Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effects of aortic occlusion (AO) on brain injury are not well defined. We examined the impact of AO by resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) and resuscitative thoracotomy (RT) on outcomes in the setting of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Patients sustaining TBI who underwent RT or REBOA in zone 1 (thoracic aorta) from September 2013 to December 2018 were identified. The indication for REBOA or RT was hemodynamic collapse due to hemorrhage below the diaphragm. Primary outcomes included mortality and systemic complications. Results: 282 patients underwent REBOA or RT. Of these, 76 had mild TBI (40 REBOA, 36 RT) and 206 sustained severe TBI (107 REBOA, 99 RT). Overall, the mean (±SD) age was 42±17 years, with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 40±17 and mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) at the time of REBOA or RT of 81±34 mm Hg. REBOA patients had a mean SBP at the time of AO of 78.39±29.45 mm Hg, whereas RT patients had a mean SBP of 83.18±37.87 mm Hg at the time of AO (p=0.24). 55% had ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) at the time of AO, and the in-hospital mortality was 86%. Binomial logistic regression controlling for TBI severity, age, ISS, SBP at the time of AO, crystalloid infusion, and CPR during AO demonstrated that the odds of mortality are 3.1 times higher for RT compared with REBOA. No significant differences were found in systemic complications between RT and REBOA. Discussion: Patients with TBI who receive REBOA may have improved survival, but no difference in systemic complications, compared with patients who receive RT for the same indication. Although some patients are receiving RT prior to arrest for extrathoracic hemorrhagic shock, these results suggest that REBOA should be considered as an alternative to RT when RT is chosen for the sole purpose of resuscitation in the setting of TBI. Level of evidence: 4.

Indexed as

brain injuriesmortalityresuscitationtraumatic

Identifiers

PMID35372698
PMCPMC8928364
OpenAlexW4220836080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.