Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372643›Full record

ArticleBone reports2022

Pathological differences in the bone healing processes between tooth extraction socket and femoral fracture.

Shinichirou Ito, Norio Kasahara, Kei Kitamura, Satoru Matsunaga, Toshihide Mizoguchi, Myo Win Htun, Yasuaki Shibata, Shinichi Abe, Masayuki Takano, Akira Yamaguchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Socket Healing and MRONJ.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Healing effect of curcumin on tooth extraction sockets in diabetic rats.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shinichirou ItoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Norio KasaharaDepartment of Histology and Developmental Biology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Kei KitamuraDepartment of Histology and Developmental Biology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru MatsunagaDepartment of Anatomy, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihide MizoguchiOral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Myo Win HtunDepartment of Histology and Cell Biology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Yasuaki ShibataDepartment of Histology and Cell Biology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Shinichi AbeDepartment of Anatomy, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki TakanoDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira YamaguchiOral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Dental College · JPNagasaki University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite various reports on the bone healing processes of tooth extraction socket and long bone fracture, the differences of pathological changes during these healing processes remain elusive. This study aims to elucidate the underlying mechanisms behind the pathophysiology of bone regeneration between the tooth extraction socket and femoral fractures through a comparative study. Eight-week-old male mice were used in the experiments. The maxillary first molar was extracted, and intramedullary nailing femoral fracture (semistabilized fracture repair) was performed in the femur. Pathological changes in these bone injuries were investigated by micro-CT, histology, immunohistochemistry, and RT-PCR until day 7 post operation. Pathological changes in drill hole injury created in cortical bone of femur were also examined. Micro-CT analyses revealed increases in mineralized tissues in both the tooth extraction socket and femoral fracture. Histological examinations revealed that tooth socket was repaired by intramembranous ossification, and intramedullary nailing femoral fracture was healed by endochondral ossification. Immunohistochemical investigation revealed that tooth socket healing associated with Sp7-positive cells but not Sox9, aggrecan, and type II collagen, while femoral fracture models exhibited positive signals for all antibodies. RT-PCR analyses revealed the expression of

Indexed as

BoneBone regenerationCartilageFractureHealing processTooth extraction socket

Identifiers

PMID35372643
PMCPMC8965168
OpenAlexW4225485341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.