Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372498›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

HER2 Low, Ultra-low, and Novel Complementary Biomarkers: Expanding the Spectrum of HER2 Positivity in Breast Cancer.

Konstantinos Venetis, Edoardo Crimini, Elham Sajjadi, Chiara Corti, Elena Guerini-Rocco, Giuseppe Viale, Giuseppe Curigliano, Carmen Criscitiello, Nicola Fusco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Phase II Trial Assessing the Repeatability and Tumor Uptake of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Konstantinos VenetisDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Edoardo CriminiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Elham SajjadiDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Chiara CortiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Elena Guerini-RoccoDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe VialeDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CuriglianoDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Carmen CriscitielloDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Nicola FuscoDivision of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HER2 status in breast cancer is assessed to select patients eligible for targeted therapy with anti-HER2 therapies. According to the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP), the HER2 test positivity is defined by protein overexpression (score 3+) at immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or gene amplification at

Indexed as

antibody-drug conjugatebiomarkersbreast cancerfluorescence in situ hybrdizationHER2 low expressionHER2 ultra lowimmunohistochemistrytargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID35372498
PMCPMC8965450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.