ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022
Assessment of the Clinical Diagnosis of Onychomycosis by Dermoscopy.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined fractional CO2 laser with topical tioconazole versus Q-switched Nd-YAG laser in the treatment of onychomycosis; a randomized comparative trial.Lasers in medical science · 2024Trial
- Dermoscopic Features of Onychomycosis Identified by Image Analysis Using a Decision Tree Algorithm.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2026Article
- Dermoscopy-guided sampling improves the diagnostic yield of fungal culture for onychomycosis: a comparative study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As a common clinical superficial fungal infection, the diagnosis of onychomycosis relies on clinical features, traditional KOH direct microscopy and fungal culture. In recent years, dermoscopy has been widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases and has provided new options for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Objective: To evaluate the value of dermoscopy in the clinical diagnosis of onychomycosis and to explore the relationship between each clinical subtype and the dermoscopic pattern. Methods: A retrospective study of 114 cases of clinically suspected onychomycosis was conducted to compare the differences between dermoscopy and fungal pathogenic examination (microscopy and culture) in the diagnostic sensitivity of onychomycosis and to analyze the relationship between nine common dermoscopic modalities and clinical subtypes of onychomycosis. Results: Among the 114 proposed patients, 87 nails with positive fluorescent staining microscopy and/or positive fungal cultures were diagnosed as onychomycosis. The sensitivity and specificity of dermatoscopy, using the mycological findings as a reference, were 86.21 and 33.33%, respectively. The incidence of common dermatoscopic patterns in the 87 nails with confirmed onychomycosis was as follows: white flocculation in 76 cases (87.35%), longitudinal nail pattern in 72 cases (82.76%), jagged changes in the distal nail plate in 69 cases (79.31%) and yellow staining in 46 cases (52.87%), these four patterns were more commonly seen in the distal lateral subungual onychomycosis and total dystrophic onychomycosis, but there was no statistical difference in the positive dermatoscopic pattern between these two types ( Conclusion: Dermoscopy can be an important aid in the diagnosis of onychomycosis, especially when fungal microscopy or culture is not appropriate, but this method is still not a substitute for fungal microscopy and culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.