Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372445›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Tissue Damage, Not Infection, Triggers Hepatic Unfolded Protein Response in an Experimental Rat Peritonitis Model.

Andrea Müllebner, Anna Herminghaus, Ingrid Miller, Martina Kames, Andreia Luís, Olaf Picker, Inge Bauer, Andrey V Kozlov, Johanna Catharina Duvigneau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea MüllebnerLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation With AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Anna HerminghausDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ingrid MillerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martina KamesDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Andreia LuísLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation With AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Olaf PickerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Inge BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrey V KozlovLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation With AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Johanna Catharina DuvigneauDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Institute for Medical Biochemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATDüsseldorf University Hospital · DELudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Abdominal surgery is an efficient treatment of intra-abdominal sepsis. Surgical trauma and peritoneal infection lead to the activation of multiple pathological pathways. The liver is particularly susceptible to injury under septic conditions. Liver function is impaired when pathological conditions induce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. ER stress triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR), aiming at restoring ER homeostasis, or inducing cell death. In order to translate basic knowledge on ER function into the clinical setting, we aimed at dissecting the effect of surgery and peritoneal infection on the progression of ER stress/UPR and inflammatory markers in the liver in a clinically relevant experimental animal model. Methods: Wistar rats underwent laparotomy followed by colon ascendens stent peritonitis (CASP) or surgery (sham) only. Liver damage (aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and De Ritis values), inflammatory and UPR markers were assessed in livers at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h postsurgery. Levels of inflammatory (IL-6, TNF-α, iNOS, and HO-1), UPR (XBP1, GRP78, CHOP), and apoptosis (BAX/Bcl-XL) mRNA were determined by qPCR. Splicing of XBP1 (XBP1s) was analyzed by gel electrophoresis, p-eIF2α and GRP78 protein levels using the western blots. Results: Aspartate aminotransferase levels were elevated 24 h after surgery and thereafter declined with different kinetics in sham and CASP groups. Compared with sham De Ritis ratios were significantly higher in the CASP group, at 48 and 96 h. CASP induced an inflammatory response after 48 h, evidenced by elevated levels of IL-6, TNF-α, iNOS, and HO-1. In contrast, UPR markers XBP1s, p-eIF2α, GRP78, XBP1, and CHOP did not increase in response to infection but paralleled the kinetics of AST and De Ritis ratios. We found that inflammatory markers were predominantly associated with CASP, while UPR markers were associated with surgery. However, in the CASP group, we found a stronger correlation between XBP1s, XBP1 and GRP78 with damage markers, suggesting a synergistic influence of inflammation on UPR in our model. Conclusion: Our results indicate that independent mechanisms induce ER stress/UPR and the inflammatory response in the liver. While peritoneal infection predominantly triggers inflammatory responses, the conditions associated with organ damage are predominant triggers of the hepatic UPR.

Indexed as

colon ascendens stent peritonitis (CASP)ER stresssepsissurgical traumasystemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)unfolded protein response

Identifiers

PMID35372445
PMCPMC8965740
OpenAlexW4220730223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.