Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372435›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Deep Learning-Based Pain Classifier Based on the Facial Expression in Critically Ill Patients.

Chieh-Liang Wu, Shu-Fang Liu, Tian-Li Yu, Sou-Jen Shih, Chih-Hung Chang, Shih-Fang Yang Mao, Yueh-Se Li, Hui-Jiun Chen, Chia-Chen Chen, Wen-Cheng Chao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Pain Medicine.Current pain and headache reports · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Pain Research and Treatment: Policy Implications.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Using AI to Detect Pain through Facial Expressions: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  17. Using artificial intelligence to improve pain assessment and pain management: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chieh-Liang WuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Shu-Fang LiuDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Tian-Li YuDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sou-Jen ShihDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chih-Hung ChangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shih-Fang Yang MaoElectronic and Optoelectronic System Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yueh-Se LiElectronic and Optoelectronic System Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Hui-Jiun ChenDepartment of Nursing, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chia-Chen ChenElectronic and Optoelectronic System Research Laboratories, Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Wen-Cheng ChaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWIndustrial Technology Research Institute · TWNational Taiwan University · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Pain assessment based on facial expressions is an essential issue in critically ill patients, but an automated assessment tool is still lacking. We conducted this prospective study to establish the deep learning-based pain classifier based on facial expressions. Methods: We enrolled critically ill patients during 2020-2021 at a tertiary hospital in central Taiwan and recorded video clips with labeled pain scores based on facial expressions, such as relaxed (0), tense (1), and grimacing (2). We established both image- and video-based pain classifiers through using convolutional neural network (CNN) models, such as Resnet34, VGG16, and InceptionV1 and bidirectional long short-term memory networks (BiLSTM). The performance of classifiers in the test dataset was determined by accuracy, sensitivity, and F1-score. Results: A total of 63 participants with 746 video clips were eligible for analysis. The accuracy of using Resnet34 in the polychromous image-based classifier for pain scores 0, 1, 2 was merely 0.5589, and the accuracy of dichotomous pain classifiers between 0 vs. 1/2 and 0 vs. 2 were 0.7668 and 0.8593, respectively. Similar accuracy of image-based pain classifier was found using VGG16 and InceptionV1. The accuracy of the video-based pain classifier to classify 0 vs. 1/2 and 0 vs. 2 was approximately 0.81 and 0.88, respectively. We further tested the performance of established classifiers without reference, mimicking clinical scenarios with a new patient, and found the performance remained high. Conclusions: The present study demonstrates the practical application of deep learning-based automated pain assessment in critically ill patients, and more studies are warranted to validate our findings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclassifiercritically ill patientsfacial expressionpain

Identifiers

PMID35372435
PMCPMC8968070
OpenAlexW4221038369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.