Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372299›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Biochemistry, Synthesis, and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose: A Review.

Snehasish Mishra, Puneet Kumar Singh, Ritesh Pattnaik, Subrat Kumar, Sanjay Kumar Ojha, Haragobinda Srichandan, Pankaj Kumar Parhi, Rajesh Kumar Jyothi, Prakash Kumar Sarangi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. EnhancingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Snehasish MishraBDTC, Bioenergy Lab, School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, India.
Puneet Kumar SinghBDTC, Bioenergy Lab, School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, India.
Ritesh PattnaikSchool of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, India.
Subrat KumarSchool of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, India.
Sanjay Kumar OjhaProfessor Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India.
Haragobinda SrichandanBDTC, Bioenergy Lab, School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar, India.
Pankaj Kumar ParhiDepartment of Chemistry, Fakir Mohan University, Balasore, India.
Rajesh Kumar JyothiConvergence Research Center for Development of Mineral Resources (DMR), Korea Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources (KIGAM), Daejeon, Korea.
Prakash Kumar SarangiDirectorate of Research, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of cellulose nanocomposites in the new-generation super-performing nanomaterials is huge, primarily in medical and environment sectors, and secondarily in food, paper, and cosmetic sectors. Despite substantial illumination on the molecular aspects of cellulose synthesis, various process features, namely, cellular export of the nascent polysaccharide chain and arrangement of cellulose fibrils into a quasi-crystalline configuration, remain obscure. To unleash its full potential, current knowledge on nanocellulose dispersion and disintegration of the fibrillar network and the organic/polymer chemistry needs expansion. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis mechanism for scaled-up production, namely, the kinetics, pathogenicity, production cost, and product quality/consistency remain poorly understood. The bottom-up bacterial cellulose synthesis approach makes it an interesting area for still wider and promising high-end applications, primarily due to the nanosynthesis mechanism involved and the purity of the cellulose. This study attempts to identify the knowledge gap and potential wider applications of bacterial cellulose and bacterial nanocellulose. This review also highlights the manufacture of bacterial cellulose through low-cost substrates, that is, mainly waste from brewing, agriculture, food, and sugar industries as well as textile, lignocellulosic biorefineries, and pulp mills.

Indexed as

bacterial cellulosebacterial nanocellulosecellulose biosynthesiscellulose fibrilslignocellulosic biorefineriesnanocellulosenanomaterials

Identifiers

PMID35372299
PMCPMC8964354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.