Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022

Comparative Study on the Efficiency of Mercury Removal From Wastewater Using Bacterial Cellulose Membranes and Their Oxidized Analogue.

D Suárez-Avendaño, E Martínez-Correa, A Cañas-Gutierrez, M Castro-Riascos, R Zuluaga-Gallego, P Gañán-Rojo, M Peresin, M Pereira, C Castro-Herazo

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Co-production of pigment and high value-added bacterial nanocellulose fromFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

D Suárez-AvendañoSchool of Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (Pontificia Bolivariana University), Medellín, Antioquia.
E Martínez-CorreaSchool of Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (Pontificia Bolivariana University), Medellín, Antioquia.
A Cañas-GutierrezSchool of Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (Pontificia Bolivariana University), Medellín, Antioquia.
M Castro-RiascosTourist and Agroindustrial Technological Complex of the West Antioquia, Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje (National Training Service), Santafé de Antioquia, Antioquia.
R Zuluaga-GallegoSchool of Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (Pontificia Bolivariana University), Medellín, Antioquia.
P Gañán-RojoSchool of Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (Pontificia Bolivariana University), Medellín, Antioquia.
M PeresinForest Products Development Center, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn, AL, United States.
M PereiraDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
C Castro-HerazoSchool of Engineering, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana (Pontificia Bolivariana University), Medellín, Antioquia.
Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana · CONational Training Service · COUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative study was conducted on the efficiency of mercury removal using bacterial nanocellulose (BNC) membranes obtained from the fermentation of the microorganism

Indexed as

bacterial nanocelluloseKomagataeibacter medellinensismercury removalTEMPO oxidationwastewater

Identifiers

PMID35372298
PMCPMC8965056
OpenAlexW4220971698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.