Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372186›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Risk Assessment and Management for Potential Living Kidney Donors: The Role of "Third-Party" Commission.

Lucia Tattoli, Davide Santovito, Ida Marina Raciti, Antonio Scarmozzino, Giancarlo Di Vella

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lucia TattoliSection of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Davide SantovitoSection of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Ida Marina RacitiClinical Risk Management Unit, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Antonio ScarmozzinoHospital Medical Direction, Ospedale Molinette, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Giancarlo Di VellaLegal Medicine Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · ITFondazione Ricerca Molinette · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living kidney donation is the most common type of living-donor transplant. Italian guidelines allow the living donations from emotionally related donors only after clear and voluntary consent expressed by both the donor and the recipient involved. Living donation raises ethical and legal issues because donors voluntarily undergo a surgical procedure to remove a healthy kidney in order to help another person. According to the Italian standards, the assessment of living donor-recipient pair has to be conducted by a medical "third party", completely independent from both the patients involved and the medical team treating the recipient. Starting from the Hospital "Città della Salute e della Scienza" of Turin (Italy) experience, including 116 living kidney donations, the Authors divided the evaluation process performed by the "Third-Party" Commission into four stages, with a particular attention to the potential donor. Living donation procedures should reflect fiduciary duties that healthcare providers have toward their patients, originating from the relationship of trust between physician and patient. In addition to that, the social implications are enormous if one considers the worldwide campaigns to promote public awareness about organ donation and transplantation, and to encourage people to register their organ donation decisions. The systematic process proposed here can be a tool that proactively reduces and controls the risks of coercion, organ trafficking, vitiated consent, insufficient weighting of donative choice, that could arise especially in donors involved in living kidney donation.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationLiving DonorsTissue and Organ ProcurementHumansItalyRisk Assessmenthealthcare safetyinformed consentkidney transplantliving organ donationrisk management“Third-Party” Commission

Identifiers

PMID35372186
PMCPMC8968079
OpenAlexW4220759428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.