Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372045›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Comparison of Supraclavicular Oblique Incision With Traditional Low Collar Incision Approach for Thyroidectomy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.

Bo Jiang, Cheng Qu, Chaoyu Jiang, Chen Zhang, Song Shen, Yuqian Luo, Lei Su

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Cheng QuDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Chaoyu JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Chen ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Song ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yuqian LuoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Lei SuDepartment of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Various incisions and approaches for thyroidectomy have been developed to treat differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Supraclavicular oblique incision (SOI) thyroidectomy (SOIT) has been applied in DTC patients over the past ten years. However, the safety and efficacy of this approach were yet to be confirmed. Aim: This study aimed to compare the surgical and patient-related outcomes between SOIT and traditional low collar incision thyroidectomy (TLCIT) in patients with DTC. Methods: We retrospectively screened all patients with DTC who received thyroid lobectomy from October 2020 to October 2021. The surgical results and patient-related outcomes assessed at 1 and 6 months after surgery by questionnaire were compared between the SOIT and TLCIT groups. Results: A total of 128 patients were included in this study, of whom 38 patients (30.5%) were operated on with SOIT and 89 patients (69.5%) with TLCIT. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics and thyroid features between the two groups. Despite comparable operative time (61.9 ± 12.1 vs. 59.9 ± 15.0 min, p = 0.425), the SOIT group had a smaller neck incision (4.4 ± 0.7 vs. 5.0 ± 1.0 cm, p = 0.002), a shorter duration of postoperative drainage (2.4 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 0.9 days, p = 0.019), less volume of postoperative drainage (48.4 ± 24.6 vs. 60.3 ± 22.8 ml, p = 0.040), and shorter postoperative hospitalization (3.2 ± 0.5 vs. 3.6 ± 0.9 days p = 0.006), as compared with the TLCIT group. At 1-month follow-up after surgery, SOIT showed better performance in preventing hypoparathyroidism (p = 0.026) and abnormal neck sensation (p = 0.010) and in improving cosmetic satisfaction (p = 0.036) than TLCIT. At 6-month follow-up, SOIT was feedback with better cosmetic satisfaction (p < 0.001) and a lower percent of abnormal neck sensation (p = 0.031) or movement (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Our study suggests that minimally invasive surgery using the SOI provides superior surgical and patient-related outcomes compared with surgery using a traditional low collar incision (TLCI) in patients with DTC.

Indexed as

differentiated thyroid cancersminimally invasive surgeryretrospective studysupraclavicular oblique incision thyroidectomytraditional low collar incision thyroidectomy

Identifiers

PMID35372045
PMCPMC8964930
OpenAlexW4221061002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.