Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35372015›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

The Prognostic Impact of Tumor Location in pT3N0M0 Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tzu Shuang Chen, Yen Ta Chen, Hung Jen Wang, Po Hui Chiang, Wen Chou Yang, Wei Ching Lee, Yao Chi Chuang, Yuan Tso Cheng, Chih Hsiung Kang, Wei Chia Lee and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tzu Shuang ChenDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yen Ta ChenDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hung Jen WangDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Po Hui ChiangJhong Siao Urological Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wen Chou YangDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wei Ching LeeDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yao Chi ChuangDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yuan Tso ChengDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chih Hsiung KangDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Wei Chia LeeDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chien Hsu ChenDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yuan Chi ShenDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yi Yang LiuDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hui Ying LiuDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yin Lun ChangDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yu Li SuDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chun Chieh HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hao Lun LuoDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWKaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We aimed to evaluate the impact of tumor location on cancer outcomes in patients with pT3N0M0 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 302 patients with pT3N0M0 UTUC who underwent RNU with bladder cuff excision at our institution between 2005 and 2019, including 191 renal pelvis tumors and 111 ureteral tumors. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between renal pelvis and ureter urothelial carcinomas. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the association between outcomes and clinical factors. Outcomes of interest included intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), which were measured using the Kaplan-Meier curve with a log-rank test. Results: A total of 302 patients underwent RNU with bladder cuff excision. During the median follow-up of 42.7 months, 70 (23.2%), 95 (31.5%), and 99 (32.8%) patients experienced intravesical recurrence, local recurrence, and distant metastasis, respectively. Seventy (23.2%) patients died from UTUC. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor location was an independent predictor of local recurrence (HR = 2.05, p = 0.001), with borderline independent significance in intravesical recurrence (HR = 1.54, p = 0.074) and distant metastasis (HR = 1.45, p = 0.08). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that ureter tumors had a worse 5-year local recurrence (log-rank p < 0.001) and borderline worse 5-year intravesical recurrence (log-rank p = 0.055) and 5-year distant metastasis (log-rank p = 0.073). Conclusion: Ureter tumors seem to be associated with worse oncological outcomes, especially with local recurrence in UTUC. Further large and long-term studies are warranted for investigating biological differences based on tumor location.

Indexed as

oncological outcomespT3N0M0radical nephroureterectomytumor locationupper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35372015
PMCPMC8964942
OpenAlexW4221099154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.