Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371991›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Geometric and Dosimetric Evaluation of the Automatic Delineation of Organs at Risk (OARs) in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Radiotherapy Based on a Modified DenseNet Deep Learning Network.

Fuli Zhang, Qiusheng Wang, Anning Yang, Na Lu, Huayong Jiang, Diandian Chen, Yanjun Yu, Yadi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Review of Artificial Intelligence Application for Radiotherapy.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fuli ZhangRadiation Oncology Department, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiusheng WangSchool of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Anning YangSchool of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Na LuRadiation Oncology Department, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huayong JiangRadiation Oncology Department, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Diandian ChenRadiation Oncology Department, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yanjun YuRadiation Oncology Department, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yadi WangRadiation Oncology Department, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To introduce an end-to-end automatic segmentation model for organs at risk (OARs) in thoracic CT images based on modified DenseNet, and reduce the workload of radiation oncologists. Materials and Methods: The computed tomography (CT) images of 36 lung cancer patients were included in this study, of which 27 patients' images were randomly selected as the training set, 9 patients' as the testing set. The validation set was generated by cross validation and 6 patients' images were randomly selected from the training set during each epoch as the validation set. The autosegmentation task of the left and right lungs, spinal cord, heart, trachea and esophagus was implemented, and the whole training time was approximately 5 hours. Geometric evaluation metrics including the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95) and average surface distance (ASD), were used to assess the autosegmentation performance of OARs based on the proposed model and were compared with those based on U-Net as benchmarks. Then, two sets of treatment plans were optimized based on the manually contoured targets and OARs (Plan1), as well as the manually contours targets and the automatically contoured OARs (Plan2). Dosimetric parameters, including Dmax, Dmean and Vx, of OARs were obtained and compared. Results: The DSC, HD95 and ASD of the proposed model were better than those of U-Net. The differences in the DSC of the spinal cord and esophagus, differences in the HD95 of the spinal cord, heart, trachea and esophagus, as well as differences in the ASD of the spinal cord were statistically significant between the two models ( Conclusions: The bilateral lungs, spinal cord, heart and trachea could be accurately delineated using the proposed model in this study; however, the automatic segmentation effect of the esophagus must still be further improved. The concept of feature map reuse provides a new idea for automatic medical image segmentation.

Indexed as

deep learningDenseNetfeature reusemedical image segmentationnon-small-cell lung cancerorgans at risk

Identifiers

PMID35371991
PMCPMC8964972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.