Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371989›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

18F-FDG PET Radiomics as Predictor of Treatment Response in Oesophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Letizia Deantonio, Maria Luisa Garo, Gaetano Paone, Maria Carla Valli, Stefano Cappio, Davide La Regina, Marco Cefali, Maria Celeste Palmarocchi, Alberto Vannelli, Sara De Dosso

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Letizia DeantonioRadiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Maria Luisa GaroMathsly Research, Brescia, Italy.
Gaetano PaoneClinic for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Maria Carla ValliRadiation Oncology Clinic, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Stefano CappioClinic for Radiology, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Davide La ReginaDepartment of Surgery, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Marco CefaliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Maria Celeste PalmarocchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Alberto VannelliDepartment of General Surgery, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy.
Sara De DossoUniversity of Southern Switzerland, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland.
Institute of Oncology Research · CHEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHOspedale Valduce · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The best treatment strategy for oesophageal cancer patients achieving a complete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is a burning topic. The available diagnostic tools, such as 18F-FDG PET/CT performed routinely, cannot accurately evaluate the presence or absence of the residual tumour. The emerging field of radiomics may encounter the critical challenge of personalised treatment. Radiomics is based on medical image analysis, executed by extracting information from many image features; it has been shown to provide valuable information for predicting treatment responses in oesophageal cancer. This systematic review with a meta-analysis aims to provide current evidence of 18F-FDG PET-based radiomics in predicting response treatments following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer. A comprehensive literature review identified 1160 studies, of which five were finally included in the study. Our findings provided that pooled Area Under the Curve (AUC) of the five selected studies was relatively high at 0.821 (95% CI: 0.737-0.904) and not influenced by the sample size of the studies. Radiomics models exhibited a good performance in predicting pathological complete responses (pCRs). This review further strengthens the great potential of 18F-FDG PET-based radiomics to predict pCRs in oesophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Additionally, our review imparts additional support to prospective studies on 18F-FDG PET radiomics for a tailored treatment strategy of oesophageal cancer patients. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021274636.

Indexed as

18F-FDG PETcomplete clinical responseneoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyoesophageal cancerpathological complete responseradiomics

Identifiers

PMID35371989
PMCPMC8965232
OpenAlexW4220729145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.