ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Effect of cervical alignment change after anterior cervical fusion on radiological adjacent segment pathology.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Outcomes of 1-Level vs. 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Hidden blood loss and risk factors in percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2025Article
- The Efficacy of Cervical Lordosis Rehabilitation for Nerve Root Function and Pain in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Randomized Trial with 2-Year Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adjacent segment pathology (ASP) is one of the primary complications affecting the long-term efficacy of anterior cervical fusion (ACF). At present, the cause and mechanism of adjacent segmental lesions are still controversial. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis on 88 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) who had been followed up for at least 1 year after ACF. The patients were divided into radiological adjacent segment pathology (RASP) and non-RASP groups according to the presence of postoperative RASP. On the lateral radiographs of the cervical spine of all patients taken before and after surgery at the short-term and final follow-ups, the following parameters were measured: C2-7 Cobb angle of the cervical vertebrae; Cobb angle of the operated segments; and the anterior and posterior height of the fused segments [i.e., the anterior fusion segment height (AFH) and the posterior fusion segment height (PFH)]. The intra- and inter-group differences of the patients before and after surgery were calculated, as well as correlation of ACF with the occurrence of RASP. Results: There were 42 cases in the RASP group and 46 cases in the non-RASP group. In the RASP group, the C2-7 Cobb angle was significantly reduced in the short term after surgery (20.42±9.92° Conclusions: Decreased cervical lordosis after ACF may be related to postoperative RASP. Maintaining good cervical curvature after surgery may reduce the incidence of RASP after ACF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.