Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371939›Full record

ReviewQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Remote vascular interventional surgery robotics: a literature review.

Yang Zhao, Ziyang Mei, Xiaoxiao Luo, Jingsong Mao, Qingliang Zhao, Gang Liu, Dezhi Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Contactless robotic system for linear catheter advancement using magnetic actuation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Passive haptic interface for robot-assisted endovascular catheterization.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A Master-Follower Teleoperation System for Robotic Catheterisation: Design, Characterisation and Tracking Control.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Teleoperated robotic surgical system for percutaneous coronary intervention.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Bedside Admittance Control of a Dual-Segment Soft Robot for Catheter-Based Interventions.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Toward a novel soft robotic system for minimally invasive interventions.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  15. Current State of Robotics in Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Application and challenges of a metaverse in medicine.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yang ZhaoDepartment of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Ziyang MeiDepartment of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Xiaoxiao LuoDepartment of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Jingsong MaoDepartment of Radiology, Xiang'an Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Qingliang ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Gang LiuState Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics Center for Molecular Imaging and Translational Medicine, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Dezhi WuDepartment of Mechanical & Electrical Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular interventional doctors are exposed to radiation hazards during surgery and endure high work intensity. Remote vascular interventional surgery robotics is a hot research field, in which researchers aim to not only protect the health of interventional doctors, but to also improve surgical accuracy and efficiency. However, the current vascular interventional robots have numerous shortcomings, such as poor haptic feedback, few compatible surgeries and instruments, and cumbersome maintenance and operational procedures. Nevertheless, vascular interventional surgery combined with robotics provides more cutting-edge directions, such as Internet remote surgery combined with 5G network technology and the application of artificial intelligence in surgical procedures. To summarize the developmental status and key technical points of intravascular interventional surgical robotics research, we performed a systematic literature search to retrieve original articles related to remote vascular interventional surgery robotics published up to December 2020. This review, which includes 113 articles published in English, introduces the mechanical and structural characteristics of various aspects of vascular interventional surgical robotics, discusses the current key features of vascular interventional surgical robotics in force sensing, haptic feedback, and control methods, and summarizes current frontiers in autonomous surgery, long-distance robotic telesurgery, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible structures. On the basis of summarizing the current research status of remote vascular interventional surgery robotics, we aim to propose a variety of prospects for future robotic systems.

Indexed as

Haptic feedbackmedical roboticsvascular interventional surgery

Identifiers

PMID35371939
PMCPMC8923856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.