Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371935›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

Rapid and automatic assessment of early gestational age using computer vision and biometric measurements based on ultrasound video.

Yuanyuan Pei, Wenjing Gao, Longjiang E, Changpin Dai, Jin Han, Haiyu Wang, Huiying Liang

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuanyuan Pei *Clinical Data Center of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenjing Gao *Clinical Data Center of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Longjiang EClinical Data Center of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Changpin DaiDepartment of Ultrasonography, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jin HanPrenatal Diagnosis Center of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Haiyu WangDepartment of Ultrasonography, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Huiying LiangClinical Data Center of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early gestational age (GA) assessment using ultrasound is a routine and frequent examination performed in hospitals whereby clinicians manually measure the size of the gestational sac using ultrasound and calculate GA. However, the error is often substantial, and the process is laborious. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new system to assess early GA using a new end-to-end computer vision system and a new biometric measurement method based on ultrasound video. Methods: In this retrospective study, a new system was provided. B-ultrasound videos were first decomposed into two-dimensional (2D) images, and the contours of the gestational sac were extracted and drawn. The maximum length and short diameter of the gestational sac were then automatically measured and GA was calculated using the Hellman formula. Finally, through human-machine comparison, the clinicians' assessment errors were analyzed by SPSS 26. Results: In this study, 29,829 2D images of 191 B-ultrasound videos were evaluated using the new system. Clinicians usually require 15-20 min to complete assessments of GA, whereas with the new system assessments can be completed in approximately 30 s. Moreover, a human-machine comparison showed that the system helped intermediate skills clinicians improve their relative diagnostic error by 13.45% with an absolute error of 7 days. In addition, the new system was used to identify other lesions in the uterus and measure their size as a "sanity check". Conclusions: The proposed new system is a practical, reproducible, and reliable approach for assessing early GA.

Indexed as

biometric measurementB-ultrasoundComputer visiongestational age (GA)gestational sac

Identifiers

PMID35371935
PMCPMC8923872
OpenAlexW4206065399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.