ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2022
Risk factors for cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail of double proximal screw design.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lag screw cutout risk factors in geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Measurement of the principal compressive trabeculae in the midcoronal plane of proximal femur and its significance in lag screw fixation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Patient-specific anatomical alignment relative to the contralateral collodiaphyseal angle as an independent predictor of screw cut-out after proximal femoral nailing.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Inferior Screw Referenced Calcar Tip Apex Distance as the Most Accurate Predictor of Mechanical Cut Out in Dual-Screw Proximal Femoral Nails.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- One-Year Follow-Up Cognitive Decline After Hip Fracture Surgery: The Prognostic Role of NSE and S100B Biomarkers in Elderly Patients, a Multicentric Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Predicting mechanical complications in proximal femoral nailing for elderly patients: a radiological scoring system based on a single-centre retrospective cohort with 586 cases.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- Lag Screw Design Is a Predictor for Cut-Out Complication After Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treatment in Elderly. A Comparative Analysis.Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Key factors for increased tip-apex distance when treating intertrochanteric fractures with InterTAN nails.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Predictive value of tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance for cut-out in 398 femoral intertrochanteric fractures treated in a private practice with dynamic intramedullary nailing.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFF) are often seen in the elderly after a simple fall because of osteoporosis, and treatment is generally provided with proximal femoral nail (PFN). The complication of cut-out, which can develop as a result of PFN treatment of IFF, is a significant cause of morbidity. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors for cut-out in cases treated with double proximal screw design nail (DPSDN). Methods: A retrospective examination was made of patients aged> 70 years, who were operated on for IFF using DPSDN between January 2018 and December 2020. A record was made of the potential risk factors of age, gender, osteoporosis level (Singh Osteoporosis Index), fracture classification (AO/OTA classification), reduction quality, tip-apex distance(calTAD), and proximal screw placement values. Using logistic regression analysis, it was attempted to determine predictive factors for cut-out complication in cases operated on with DPSDN. Results: With 219 cases included in the study, two groups were formed as cut-out and non-cut-out. Reduction quality, calTAD, and proximal screw placement were seen to be risk factors for cut-out. According to the univariate logistic regression analysis, the cut-out risk was 57.917-fold greater in those with "poor" reduction quality compared to those with "good" reduction quality, the risk was 17-fold greater in those with "superior"screw placement compared to "central" placement (p < 0.001), and 9.24-fold greater in those with "anterior" placement compared to "central" placement (p < 0.001). The cutoff value for calTAD for the diagnosis of cut-out was found to be > 25.5 mm (p = 0.026). Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that the most important risk factors in the use of DPSDN are reduction quality, calTAD and proximal screw placement,. It was also concluded that just as in implants designed with a single screw, there is an increased risk when calTAD is > 25 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.