Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371917›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2022

Risk factors for cut-out in intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail of double proximal screw design.

Ali Şişman, Özgür Avci, Serdar Kamil Çepni, Suat Batar, Ömer Polat

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ali ŞişmanUmraniye Health Sciences University Training and Research Hospital Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Özgür AvciTavsanlı State Hospital Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tavsanlı, Kütahya, Turkey.
Serdar Kamil ÇepniUmraniye Health Sciences University Training and Research Hospital Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Suat BatarUmraniye Health Sciences University Training and Research Hospital Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ömer PolatUmraniye Health Sciences University Training and Research Hospital Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSivas State Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intertrochanteric femoral fractures (IFF) are often seen in the elderly after a simple fall because of osteoporosis, and treatment is generally provided with proximal femoral nail (PFN). The complication of cut-out, which can develop as a result of PFN treatment of IFF, is a significant cause of morbidity. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors for cut-out in cases treated with double proximal screw design nail (DPSDN). Methods: A retrospective examination was made of patients aged> 70 years, who were operated on for IFF using DPSDN between January 2018 and December 2020. A record was made of the potential risk factors of age, gender, osteoporosis level (Singh Osteoporosis Index), fracture classification (AO/OTA classification), reduction quality, tip-apex distance(calTAD), and proximal screw placement values. Using logistic regression analysis, it was attempted to determine predictive factors for cut-out complication in cases operated on with DPSDN. Results: With 219 cases included in the study, two groups were formed as cut-out and non-cut-out. Reduction quality, calTAD, and proximal screw placement were seen to be risk factors for cut-out. According to the univariate logistic regression analysis, the cut-out risk was 57.917-fold greater in those with "poor" reduction quality compared to those with "good" reduction quality, the risk was 17-fold greater in those with "superior"screw placement compared to "central" placement (p < 0.001), and 9.24-fold greater in those with "anterior" placement compared to "central" placement (p < 0.001). The cutoff value for calTAD for the diagnosis of cut-out was found to be > 25.5 mm (p = 0.026). Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrated that the most important risk factors in the use of DPSDN are reduction quality, calTAD and proximal screw placement,. It was also concluded that just as in implants designed with a single screw, there is an increased risk when calTAD is > 25 mm.

Indexed as

Cut-outDouble screwIntertrochanteric fracturesRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35371917
PMCPMC8966204
OpenAlexW4220731632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.