ArticleCureus2022
Carotid Stump Syndrome With Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Carotid Stump Syndrome: A Case That Highlights the Necessity of Digital Subtraction Angiography for the Prompt Management of the Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carotid stump syndrome (CSS) is a rare cause of recurrent ipsilateral cerebrovascular events that typically manifests as transient ischemic attacks or amaurosis fugax. The cause of these recurrent symptoms is thought to be microembolization from an occluded internal carotid artery that reaches intracranial circulation through anastomoses. We undertook a systematic literature review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases of the endovascular treatment options for CSS. Nine papers met the inclusion criteria and provided patient data on 12 patients, and one case illustration is presented. Treatment was with common carotid artery-external carotid artery stent graft without concomitant coil embolization in nine patients and with coil embolization without stenting, the breakthrough of the stump with a wire and subsequent internal carotid artery stent placement, and stent-assisted coil embolization in one patient each. During a median follow-up of six months, all patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy except one on undefined "systemic anticoagulation." Twelve patients had no symptoms after treatment, one had transient expressive aphasia but no further symptoms after being placed on anticoagulation, and none had intraprocedural complications or had to undergo retreatment. Our review indicates that endovascular treatment of CSS is associated with low intraprocedural risk and is effective at treating recurrent symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.