ReviewCureus2022
Intrauterine Fetal Gene Therapy: Is That the Future and Is That Future Now?
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Postnatal Slc26a4 gene therapy improves hearing and structural integrity in a hereditary hearing loss model.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Transabdominal ultrasound guided AAV9-GFP delivery in fetal pigs: a translational and minimally invasive model for in utero fetal gene therapy.Gene therapy · 2025Article
- Transforming Spinal Muscular Atrophy: From Pivotal Trials to Real-World Evidence and Future Therapeutic Frontiers in Types 1 and 2.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The Application of Engineered Nanomaterials in Perinatal Therapeutics.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024Review
- Placental Gene Therapy for Fetal Growth Restriction and Preeclampsia: Preclinical Studies and Prospects for Clinical Application.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Gene Therapy for Achromatopsia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- In vivo rescue of genetic dilated cardiomyopathy by systemic delivery of nexilin.Genome biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Researchers are looking into techniques to intervene sooner and earlier in the disease process thanks to advances in disease genetics, etiologies, and prenatal diagnosis. We conducted a literature search in PubMed-indexed journals to provide an overview of the evolution of gene therapy, rationale for prenatal gene therapy, uses and risks of gene therapy, and ethical issues following the usage of gene therapy. Recent animal research has revealed that transmitting genetic material to a growing fetus through viral and non-viral vectors is conceivable besides proving how gene-editing technology is achieved by various mechanisms that utilize zinc finger nucleases, TAL effector nucleases, and clustered short palindromic repeats-Cas9 complex. This review offers an overview of the current knowledge in the field of prenatal gene therapy, as well as potential future research avenues. In addition, it weighs the risks of prenatal gene therapy, such as oncogenesis, genetic mutation transfer from mother to child, and fetal disruption, against the expected benefits, such as preventing the development of severe early-onset illness symptoms, targeting previously inaccessible organs, and establishing tolerance to the therapeutic transgenic protein, all of which lead to permanent somatic gene correction. This review discusses the scientific, ethical, legal, and sociological implications of these groundbreaking genetic disease prevention techniques, as well as the parameters that must be satisfied for a future clinical application to be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.