ArticleCureus2022
Limited Utility of Chemotherapy for Pulmonary Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis Due to Unclear Diagnostic Criteria.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis presenting as an uncommon mass in the lung: A rare case report and literature review.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH) is a rare interstitial lung disease that affects young adults and is typically misdiagnosed or presents concurrently with more common respiratory conditions such as asthma or chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD). A combination of imaging, tissue biopsy, and clinical presentation is used for diagnosis since no definitive criteria have been established. Current standards are based on vague descriptors such as clustering of histologic markers but lack quantitative analysis. In this case report, we present a patient who was initially diagnosed with PLCH, but the lack of unanimity for diagnostic requirements led to conflicting diagnoses between institutions which may have prevented optimal care for the patient. The disparity limited new, alternative therapies for our patient that may have been beneficial since he was clinically not improving with smoking cessation and standard of care for obstructive lung diseases. However, quantitative endorsements for tissue analysis, such as requiring more than 30 Cd-1a stained Langerhans cells per high power field (HPF), may reduce discrepancies associated with current techniques. It is imperative that clear standards are established due to the unique treatment these patients require that is atypical from other pulmonary diseases such as asthma and COPD. New chemotherapeutic regimens such as cladribine and vemurafenib require oncologic care and have more broad side effects than typical pulmonary treatments, which emphasize the need for accurate diagnoses before starting treatment. Existing standards have created circumstances where PLCH is a differential but cannot be ruled out due to unclear criteria and limited research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.