Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371787›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Hypernatremia at a Tertiary Hospital Intensive Care Unit in South Africa.

Limbani Mapata, Guy A Richards, Abdullah E Laher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Limbani MapataEmergency Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZAF.
Guy A RichardsCritical Care, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZAF.
Abdullah E LaherEmergency Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZAF.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Hypernatremia in the critical care setting is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. However, data pertaining to this has not been evaluated in South African hospitals. The aim of this study was to evaluate hypernatremia with regards to its prevalence, associated factors, and outcomes at an academic hospital intensive care unit (ICU) in Johannesburg, South Africa. Methods The ICU charts of patients admitted to the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital adult general ICU from June 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Subjects were categorized into three groups namely, ICU-acquired hypernatremia (IAH), pre-admission hypernatremia (PAH), and normonatremia. Data was compared between the three groups. Results Of the 833 subjects that were enrolled, 310 (37.2%) were hypernatremic. IAH was present in 144 (17.2%) and PAH in 166 (19.9%) subjects. Hypernatremia was significantly (p <0.05) associated with a higher rate of altered mental status, higher Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, a higher rate and duration of mechanical ventilation, a greater need for inotropic/vasopressor support, longer ICU stay and higher ICU mortality. Conclusion Hypernatremia in ICU patients remains a significant contributor to morbidity, mortality, and ICU length of stay. The prevalence of hypernatremia was much higher than that reported in higher-income countries.

Indexed as

hypernatremiaicu-acquired hypernatremiamortalityoutcomespre-admission hypernatremiasodium

Identifiers

PMID35371787
PMCPMC8962634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.