ArticleCureus2022
Adherence to Hypoglycemic Agents in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with treatment compliance among middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims This study aimed to elucidate the level and determinants of adherence to oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and to employ patient interview as a prediction tool for suboptimal adherence, for preventing and reducing complications. Methods In this analytical, cross-sectional study, 383 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were interviewed using an electronic, self-constructed, validated questionnaire. Patients were recruited from all Ministry of Health centers across Jeddah, through stratified random sampling. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the significance of the results. Results Suboptimal levels of adherence were reported by 74.9% of the participants. Predictors of suboptimal adherence are as follows: younger age (P = 0.003), employment [odd ratio (OR), 1.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1-3.0], unavailability of reminder (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), and non-commitment to appointments (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1). Conclusion The level of adherence to OHAs was found to be suboptimal. Encountering any of the predictors of suboptimal adherence while interviewing the patient should prompt extra vigilance in the approach. Furthermore, utilizing methods to augment adherence might be prudent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.