ArticleCureus2022
Critical Care Management of a Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome COVID-19 Patient With Control Cesarean Section.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We share our experience of one 29-year-old female, G2 P1, with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and at 30 weeks of pregnancy. The 30-week gravid uterus in combination with a poor ventilation-perfusion ratio creates a restrictive lung pattern that may prove to be lethal for both the mother and baby. Due to her rapid deterioration and increased hemodynamic instability we opted for controlled delivery in the operating room with an ICU physician, a Neonatologist, and an Obstetric team. At 3.27 minutes from induction, the baby was born with Apgar scores of 7 and 8. The mother was placed on a RotoProne® bed, treated with remdesivir, steroids, and was subsequently extubated seven days later. The newborn was admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) after delivery. We have reviewed the literature and provided a concise set of recommendations based on our field experience and current world literature review. Prompt delivery in a controlled environment with multiple resuscitating teams provided expeditious treatment of both patients, maintaining oxygenation and perfusion while keeping hemodynamic stability. The controlled environment and the proximity of all teams avoided deleterious consequences to the unborn baby. This is an example where the risk of keeping the baby in the womb outweighs the premature delivery into a NICU. Both mother and baby were downgraded from their respective Intensive Care Units (ICUs) and discharged home in one month.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.