ArticleCureus2022
Revised Glycemic Index for Diagnosing and Monitoring of Diabetes Mellitus in South Indian Population.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo find the optimal threshold of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) and to evaluate the association with diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the South Indian population. SETTINGS AND
designA retrospective population-based study. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 909 newly detected type 2 DM patients were selected from our two previously conducted studies, which include an urban and a rural population of South India. All underwent estimation of fasting, postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), and other biochemical tests. A comprehensive and detailed ophthalmic examination was carried out. The fundi of patients were photographed using 45°, four-field stereoscopic photography. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity and specificity were derived.
resultsThe optimal cut-off values determined by maximizing the sensitivity and specificity of FPG and HbA1c using the Youden index were ≥ 6.17 mmol/L and ≥ 6.3%, respectively. By distributing the cut-off points into deciles and comparing them to the WHO criteria, we found that our HbA1c level of 6.60% was more than the WHO threshold (6.5%), with higher sensitivity (81.6%) and lower specificity (48.3%). The FPG level of 6.80 mmol/L was lower to the WHO criteria (7 mmol/L) with increased sensitivity (77.0%) and lower specificity (45.7%). Prevalence of DR by HbA1c levels between 6.5% and 6.9% was 15.3%. The prevalence of DR was more in the FPG category between 6.4 and 6.9 mmol/L and ≥ 7.5 mmol/L.
conclusionOur population-based data indicate that for the South Indian population HbA1c value of ≥63 % and FPG value of ≥6.17 mmol/L may be optimal for diagnosing DM with a high level of accuracy and will be useful for the identification of mild and moderate DR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.