ArticleCureus2022
Functional Outcome of Closed Reduction and Extension Casting in Forearm Fractures in Children.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Legitimacy for the Use of Splint Immobilization After Elastic Intramedullary Nailing of Both-bone Forearm Shaft Fractures in Children.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Fractures in children are extremely common scenarios encountered by orthopedicians. Conservative treatment has been the most preferred choice for the management of diaphyseal forearm fractures. Traditionally, pediatric forearm fractures are treated by above elbow plaster cast with the elbow flexed to 90 degrees. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of children treated with closed reduction and extension casting for forearm fractures. Patient and methods This is a prospective study evaluating the functional and radiological outcomes of 30 children of less than the age of 14 years and without pathological fractures, treated with closed reduction and extension casting for forearm fractures, either both radius and ulna or radius or ulna at middle third level, who reported to the Department of Orthopedics, Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital, and Research Center, Pune, India, between September 2019 and March 2022. Results The mean pre-operative angulation in radius (antero-posterior {AP}) was 22.7, radius (lateral {LAT}) was 24.2, ulna (AP) was 31.2, and ulna (LAT) was 29.2. The immediate post-operative angulation of radius (AP) was 0.7, radius (LAT) was 3.2, ulna (AP) was 0.6, and ulna (LAT) was 4.9. Cast status at two weeks, 83.3% had intact cast and 16.7% had loosened casts. Post removal, most patients had a good rotation of motion (ROM) at three and six weeks. Conclusion Casting with extended elbow is much better as compared to flexion casting in the hands of a trainee doctor. Furthermore, chances of loss of reduction are negligible in extension casting as compared to flexion casting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.