ArticleCureus2022
Semirigid Fiberglass Casting for the Early Management of Clubfoot: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Management of idiopathic clubfoot: an umbrella review and CPAM-LRC consensus: Limb Reconstruction Committee of Orthopedics Branch of China International Exchange and Promotion Association for Medical and Health Care (CPAM-LRC).Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Pearls to Address Challenges in Initial Casting Treatment for Idiopathic Clubfoot.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Semirigid fiberglass (SRF) is an alternative material to plaster of Paris (POP) for idiopathic clubfoot casting in the Ponseti method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate early clinical outcomes in a series of idiopathic clubfoot patients treated with SRF at a single institution and to compare these findings to historical norms with POP casting present in the literature. Methods A series of idiopathic clubfoot patients managed exclusively with SRF in the Ponseti method was identified. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by number of casts, change in Pirani score, frequency of treatment-related complications, and frequency of surgery other than tenotomy. A comprehensive literature review was used for comparative historical norms. Results The study included 34 feet in 26 patients. Pirani score was 4.7±1.3 at presentation and 1.9±1.4 at the end of casting, representing a score change of 2.8±1.3 with SRF. Initial correction was obtained with 6.9±1.4 casts. Treatment-related complications occurred in six treated feet (17.6%) including 13 cast slippages in five feet and one cast-related thigh abrasion. A total of 25 (73.5%) feet underwent tenotomy. Two feet required an additional surgical procedure. Conclusion Clubfoot patients treated with SRF demonstrated acceptable deformity correction following Ponseti-style casting. The quantitative clinical outcomes evaluated appeared similar to norms using POP present in the literature. The findings of this study support SRF as a viable alternative to plaster casting for clubfoot correction utilizing the Ponseti method. As such, further investigation for rigorous comparative assessment is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.