ArticleIUCrJ2022
Preferred orientation and its effects on intensity-correlation measurements.
Article in IUCrJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards a quantitative description of nanostructured order in amorphous diamond-like carbon.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Visible-Light Photocatalytic Abatement of Diclofenac Potassium over Bismuth Sulfoiodide.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Synthesis, characterisation and electrochemical behaviour of calcium carbonate nanoparticles derived from automobile oxy-acetylene gas welding waste.Discover nano · 2026Article
- VMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Atomic pair distribution functions from textured polycrystalline samples: fundamentals.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2025Article
- Powder diffraction data beyond the pattern: a practical review.Journal of applied crystallography · 2025Review
- Theoretical Studies of Anisotropic Melting of Ice Induced by Ultrafast Nonthermal Heating.ACS physical chemistry Au · 2024Article
- TheJournal of applied crystallography · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensity-correlation measurements allow access to nanostructural information on a range of ordered and disordered materials beyond traditional pair-correlation methods. In real space, this information can be expressed in terms of a pair-angle distribution function (PADF) which encodes three- and four-body distances and angles. To date, correlation-based techniques have not been applied to the analysis of microstructural effects, such as preferred orientation, which are typically investigated by texture analysis. Preferred orientation is regarded as a potential source of error in intensity-correlation experiments and complicates interpretation of the results. Here, the theory of preferred orientation in intensity-correlation techniques is developed, connecting it to the established theory of texture analysis. The preferred-orientation effect is found to scale with the number of crystalline domains in the beam, surpassing the nanostructural signal when the number of domains becomes large. Experimental demonstrations are presented of the orientation-dominant and nanostructure-dominant cases using PADF analysis. The results show that even minor deviations from uniform orientation produce the strongest angular correlation signals when the number of crystalline domains in the beam is large.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.