Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371502›Full record

ReviewIUCrJ2022

MicroED: conception, practice and future opportunities.

Max T B Clabbers, Anna Shiriaeva, Tamir Gonen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in IUCrJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Membrane protein structure and dynamics probed by MicroED.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026
    Review
  3. Electrons and X-rays for diffraction and imaging.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. MicroED Structure of a Protoglobin Reactive Carbene Intermediate.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Max T B ClabbersDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5466-6508
Anna ShiriaevaDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Tamir GonenDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9254-4069

Funding

TRD4: Design and Engineering of MicroED hardware for nanocrystallization and time resolved studiesP41GM136508 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GONEN, TAMIR · 2020 to 2024
$7.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM136508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article documents a keynote seminar presented at the IUCr Congress in Prague, 2021. The cryo-EM method microcrystal electron diffraction is described and put in the context of macromolecular electron crystallography from its origins in 2D crystals of membrane proteins to today's application to 3D crystals a millionth the size of that needed for X-ray crystallography. Milestones in method development and applications are described with an outlook to the future.

Indexed as

cryo-EMcrystallographymembrane proteinsmicrocrystal electron diffractionMicroED

Identifiers

PMID35371502
PMCPMC8895021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.