Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371485›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Essential newborn care practice and associated factors among obstetric care providers of public hospitals in Sidama regional state, Ethiopia.

Dejene Negesse Gonfa, Aberash Eifa Dadhi, Andargachew Kassa, Gemechu Gelan Bekele, Amare Tesfaye Yami, Berhane Ejara Moti, Worku Ketema Bededa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dejene Negesse GonfaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Aberash Eifa DadhiDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Andargachew KassaDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
Gemechu Gelan BekeleDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-5320
Amare Tesfaye YamiDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Berhane Ejara MotiDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Science, Ambo University, Ambo, Ethiopia.
Worku Ketema BededaDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Hawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7056-6999
Ambo University · ETHawassa University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The global neonatal death rate was predicted to be 18 per 1000 live births during the first 28 days of life. Ethiopia continues to have one of the highest neonatal mortality rates in the world. Essentially, over 70% of these deaths may have been averted or prevented if proper essential newborn care had been provided. The purpose of this study was to assess the practice of essential newborn care and associated factors among obstetric care providers in public hospitals in Sidama regional state, Ethiopia. Methods: This study was conducted from 1 to 30 July 2020, using an institutionally based cross-sectional study design. The study comprised 182 obstetric care professionals from six hospitals chosen at random. EpiData (version 3.1) was used to enter data, which was then exported to SPSS (version 20). Descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable logistic regression were used. Statistical significance of the explanatory variables was declared at Results: The overall prevalence of good practice on essential newborn care was 56.6% (95% confidence interval = 49.4-63.7). Working in the delivery room (adjusted odds ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval = 2.04-10.06), having training in essential newborn care (adjusted odds ratio = 3.65, 95% confidence interval = 1.63-8.17), and access to established essential newborn care protocols (adjusted odds ratio = 6.88, 95% confidence interval = 3.10-15.26) were found to be statistically significant factors of essential newborn care practice. Conclusion: The study found that having necessary newborn care standards, being interested in working in the delivery room, and having essential newborn care training are all important factors in implementing essential newborn care practices. Important knowledge gaps were noted in key areas of essential newborn care.

Indexed as

Essential newborn careobstetric care providerpractice

Identifiers

PMID35371485
PMCPMC8972914
OpenAlexW4225587054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.