Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371430›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in chronic disease2022

Blood pressure change and cognition in childhood and early adulthood: a systematic review.

Kurt Lancaster, Ying Xu, Greg Savage, Lucette A Cysique, Ruth Peters

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in chronic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kurt LancasterDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ying XuNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW, Australia School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Greg SavageDepartment of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Lucette A CysiqueSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
Ruth PetersNeuroscience Research Australia, 139 Barker Street, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia. School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0148-3617
UNSW Sydney · AUMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: High blood pressure in midlife is an established risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia but less is known about the impact of raised blood pressure on cognition in childhood and early adulthood. Method: We systematically reviewed and quantified the existing evidence base relating to blood pressure in early life and subsequent cognitive performance. Medline, Embase, PsycINFOo, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 2020. We included longitudinal cohort and case-control studies involving participants aged 0-40 years with a baseline and at least one follow-up blood pressure assessment alongside at least one measure of cognition, occurring at the same time as, or subsequent to blood pressure measures. Risk of bias was assessed independently by two reviewers. PROSPERO registration CRD42020214655. Results: Of a total of 5638 records identified, three cohort and two case-control studies were included with ages ranging from 3 to early 30s. Repeated blood pressure measurements averaged over 25 years or cumulative blood pressure in the 25-30 years prior to assessment of cognitive function were associated with poorer cognitive performance in the two largest cohort studies. The smallest cohort study reported no evidence of an association and the results from the two case-control studies were contradictory. All studies were at risk of bias. Conclusion: Overall, the evidence in this area is lacking and study quality is mixed. Our review highlights an urgent need for studies evaluating the potential for a relationship between raised blood pressure and poorer cognition in early life given the potential for possible risk reduction if such a relationship exists.

Indexed as

cognitiondementiaearly lifehigh blood pressurehypertension

Identifiers

PMID35371430
PMCPMC8972933
OpenAlexW4225542678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.