Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371429›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2022

Changing paradigms of hemophilia care across larger specialized treatment centers in the European region.

Jerzy Windyga, Ana Boban, Irena Zupan, Niamh O'Connell, Cedric Hermans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Jerzy WindygaLaboratory of Hemostasis and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Hemostasis Disorders and Internal Medicine, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.
Ana BobanHaemophilia Centre, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Irena ZupanDepartment of Haematology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Niamh O'ConnellThe National Coagulation Centre, St James's Hospital and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cedric HermansHemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Division of Hematology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-8437
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEInstytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologi · PLTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In early 2021, the European Collaborative Haemophilia Network (ECHN) conducted a survey to determine whether the paradigms of care across the European region have changed with the introduction of novel therapies for people with hemophilia. Methods: We conducted a survey in 19 ECHN centers from 17 countries in the European region. The aim was to track recent changes in the hemophilia treatment landscape, determine the impact of these changes on hemophilia treatment centers and comprehensive care centers in the region, and to look into the future of care as applied to people with hemophilia. The survey was structured to include three key areas: demographics and organization; current challenges and opportunities; and future directions. Discussion: Our survey provides a snapshot of the current approach to hemophilia treatment that highlights a move toward preventive, rather than reactive care, but that also raises a number of key concerns related to costs and accessibility (particularly as related to novel therapies), time limitations for clinical research, and ongoing issues regarding human resources (particularly in terms of new doctors entering the field) and availability of laboratory resources as the use of novel therapies (some with unique modes of action and unusual adverse events, some with specialized monitoring requirements) becomes commonplace. Conclusion: While our survey suggests that specialized care will continue to play a central role in the management of hemophilia, the standards and protocols, as well as the centers themselves, will have to continue to evolve if they are to continue to provide the highest level of care. To meet this requirement, there is a clear need for engaging, ongoing education programs for healthcare professionals working in the field of hemophilia that can be adjusted to the changing landscape of hemophilia therapy and monitoring.

Indexed as

Bleeding disordersemicizumabgene therapyhemophiliahemophilia treatment centersmanagement guidelinesnovel hemophilia therapiesoutcomesprophylaxistreatment

Identifiers

PMID35371429
PMCPMC8966074
OpenAlexW4225641697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.