Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371382›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2022

[Descriptive cross-sectional study assessing the clinical and paraclinic profiles of monoclonal gammopathies in an agricultural region of Souss-Massa, Morocco].

Aissam El Maataoui, Aadil Taoufiq, Salma Fares, Kaouthar Sokori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aissam El MaataouiIbn Zohr University, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Agadir, Morocco.
Aadil TaoufiqIbn Zohr University, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Agadir, Morocco.
Salma FaresIbn Zohr University, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Agadir, Morocco.
Kaouthar SokoriHassan II Hospital, Moroccan Ministry of Health, Agadir, Morocco.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: given the lack of information about monoclonal gammopathies, our primary study outcome was to describe the epidemiological, clinical and biochemical profiles of monoclonal gammopathies in the Souss-Massa region, in southern Morocco. Methods: we conducted a retrospective study, by selecting only complete medical records. We used records of patients diagnosed with monoclonal gammopathy at the local oncology center during a period of over 10 years. Results: one hundred and seventeen patients were included in the study, with a high male predominance (65%) and a male/female sex-ratio of 1.85. The average age of our study population was 61.44 (ET 14.54) years. Diagnoses (based on frequency) included: multiple myeloma 82.0% (n=96), solitary plasmacytoma 8.5% (n=10), monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance 2.6% (n=3), lymphoma 2.5% (n=3), secondary plasma cell leukaemia 1.7% (n=2), Waldenström´s disease 1.7%(n=2) and chronic lymphoid leukemia (n=1). The isotype distribution was as follows: IgG Kappa 33.7% (n=28), IgG lambda 21.7% (n=18), IgA Kappa 12.0% (n=10), IgA lambda 7.2% (n=6), IgM kappa 3.6% (n=3), and IgD lambda 2.4% (n=2). Biconal peak was reached in two cases, with a percentage of 2.4%. Conclusion: diagnostic delay was observed compared to international studies due to the unavailability of electrophoresis in the care structures.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisParaproteinemiasAdolescentCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMoroccoRetrospective StudieslymphomasMonoclonal gammopathiesmonoclonal gammopathy of unknown significanceMoroccomyelomaplasmocytomaWaldenström

Identifiers

PMID35371382
PMCPMC8933443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.