ReviewPrzeglad gastroenterologiczny2022
Meta-analysis and systematic review of liver transplantation as an ultimate treatment option for secondary sclerosing cholangitis.
Review in Przeglad gastroenterologiczny, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell-Associated Cholangiopathy: First Reported Case of a Complication of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.ACG case reports journal · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of Single-Pass Albumin Dialysis (SPAD), Prometheus, and Molecular Adsorbent Recycling System (MARS) liver haemodialysis vs. Standard Medical Therapy (SMT): meta-analysis and systematic review.Przeglad gastroenterologiczny · 2024Review
- Secondary Sclerosing Cholangitis After SARS-CoV2: ICU Ketamine Use or Virus-Specific Biliary Tropism and Injury in the Context of Biliary Ischemia in Critically Ill Patients?Hepatic medicine : evidence and research · 2023Article
- Biliary Cast Syndrome and Secondary Sclerosing Cholangitis in Critically Ill Patient after Long-Term Treatment in the Intensive Care Unit.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Secondary sclerosing cholangitis (SSC) is a chronic cholestatic biliary disease, characterized by inflammation, obliterative fibrosis of the bile ducts, stricture formation, and progressive destruction of the biliary tree, which leads to biliary cirrhosis. In recent years, the development of secondary sclerosing cholangitis in critically ill patients (SSC-CIP) has increasingly been perceived as a separate disease entity. Aim: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of secondary sclerosing cholangitis and ischaemic cholangiopathy in post organ transplant patients and intensive care unit (ICU). Material and methods: A comprehensive search strategy using the PubMed, Biosis, and EMBASE databases was designed to retrieve relevant clinical data from the published literature up to 2020. Demographic characteristics, laboratory, transplantation, mortality rate, and follow-up data undergoing liver transplantation were extracted from the inclusion studies. We used DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analysis. Analysis was carried out using R statistical software version 4.02. Results: A total of 862 patients with SSC-CIP were extracted from 16 studies. Eighteen studies were searched for the meta-analysis, out of which 16 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis and 2 were excluded. A proportion meta-analysis was performed on liver transplant patients with SSC-CIP and on mortality rate. Significant results were found (Prop = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.12-0.49, Conclusions: The systematic review and meta-analysis show that liver transplantation is a valid option for patients with SSC-CIP, with excellent long-term outcome and improvement of quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.