ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Classifying Driving Fatigue by Using EEG Signals.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discrimination of temporal fatigue-related states and inferred brain-function coupling in subway drivers under emotional influence.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- YOLO-FDCL: Improved YOLOv8 for Driver Fatigue Detection in Complex Lighting Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advancements in Fatigue Detection: Integrating fNIRS and Non-Voluntary Attention Brain Function Experiments.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Driving fatigue detection based on brain source activity and ARMA model.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Investigating multilevel cognitive processing within error-free and error-prone feedback conditions in executed and observed car driving.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Characterisation of Cognitive Load Using Machine Learning Classifiers of Electroencephalogram Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deep Learning for Detecting Multi-Level Driver Fatigue Using Physiological Signals: A Comprehensive Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fatigue driving is one of the main reasons for the occurrence of traffic accidents. Brain-computer interface, as a human-computer interaction method based on EEG signals, can communicate with the outside world and move freely through brain signals without relying on the peripheral neuromuscular system. In this paper, a simulation driving platform composed of driving simulation equipment and driving simulation software is used to simulate the real driving process. The EEG signals of the subjects are collected through simulated driving, and the EEG of five subjects is selected as the training sample, and the remaining one is the subject. As a test sample, perform feature extraction and classification experiments, select any set of normal signals and fatigue signals recorded in the driving fatigue experiment for data analysis, and then study the classification of driver fatigue levels. Experiments have proved that the PSO-H-ELM algorithm has only about 4% advantage compared with the average accuracy of the KNN algorithm and the SVM algorithm. The gap is not as big as expected, but as a new algorithm, it is applied to the detection of fatigue EEG. The two traditional algorithms are indeed more suitable. It shows that the driver fatigue level can be judged by detecting EEG, which will provide a basis for the development of on-board, real-time driving fatigue alarm devices. It will lay the foundation for traffic management departments to intervene in driving fatigue reasonably and provide a reliable basis for minimizing traffic accidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.