Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371201›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Image Segmentation under the Optimization Algorithm of Krill Swarm and Machine Learning.

Qiang Geng, Huifeng Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Qiang GengSchool of Big Data & Software Engineering, Chongqing College of Mobile Communication, Chongqing 401520, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-9683
Huifeng YanSchool of Software Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0063-8816

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to improve the efficiency and accuracy of image segmentation, and to compare and study traditional threshold-based image segmentation methods and machine learning model-based image segmentation methods. The krill herb optimization algorithm is combined with the traditional maximum between-class variance function to form a new graph segmentation algorithm. The pet dataset is used to train the algorithm model and build an image semantic segmentation system. The results show that when the traditional Ostu algorithm performs image single-threshold segmentation, the number of iterations is about 256. When double-threshold segmentation is performed, the number of iterations increases exponentially, and the execution time is about 2 s. The number of iterations of the improved Krill Herd algorithm in single-threshold segmentation is 6.95 times, respectively. The execution time for double-threshold segmentation is about 0.24 s. The number of iterations is only improved by a factor of 0.19. The average classification accuracy of the Unet network model and the SegNet network model is 86.3% and 91.9%, respectively. The average classification accuracy of the DC-Unet network model reaches 93.1%. This shows that the proposed fusion algorithm has high optimization efficiency and stronger practicability in multithreshold image segmentation. The DC-Unet network model can improve the image detail segmentation effect. The research provides a new idea for finding an efficient and accurate image segmentation method.

Indexed as

EuphausiaceaAlgorithmsAnimalsMachine LearningSemantics

Identifiers

PMID35371201
PMCPMC8970905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.