Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35371164›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Genome Engineering Technology for Durable Disease Resistance: Recent Progress and Future Outlooks for Sustainable Agriculture.

Qurban Ali, Chenjie Yu, Amjad Hussain, Mohsin Ali, Sunny Ahmar, Muhammad Aamir Sohail, Muhammad Riaz, Muhammad Furqan Ashraf, Dyaaaldin Abdalmegeed, Xiukang Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genetic engineering and the eye.Eye (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Degradation Mechanism of Autophagy-Related Proteins and Research Progress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Qurban AliState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Institute of Agro-product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Chenjie YuKey Laboratory of Monitoring and Management of Crop Disease and Pest Insects, College of Plant Protection, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Amjad HussainCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Mohsin AliCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Sunny AhmarInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology, and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Muhammad Aamir SohailCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Muhammad RiazState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-bioresources, Root Biology Center, College of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Muhammad Furqan AshrafState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, China.
Dyaaaldin AbdalmegeedKey Laboratory of Monitoring and Management of Crop Disease and Pest Insects, College of Plant Protection, Ministry of Education, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Xiukang WangCollege of Life Sciences, Yan'an University, Yan'an, China.
Muhammad ImranKey Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Agriculture, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou, China.
Hakim ManghwarLushan Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Jiujiang, China.
Lei ZhouState Key Laboratory for Managing Biotic and Chemical Threats to the Quality and Safety of Agro-products, Institute of Agro-product Safety and Nutrition, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Huazhong Agricultural University · CNNanjing Agricultural University · CNLushan Botanical Garden · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CNState Key Laboratory For Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-BioresourcesUniversity of Silesia in Katowice · PLYan'an University · CNZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop production worldwide is under pressure from multiple factors, including reductions in available arable land and sources of water, along with the emergence of new pathogens and development of resistance in pre-existing pathogens. In addition, the ever-growing world population has increased the demand for food, which is predicted to increase by more than 100% by 2050. To meet these needs, different techniques have been deployed to produce new cultivars with novel heritable mutations. Although traditional breeding continues to play a vital role in crop improvement, it typically involves long and laborious artificial planting over multiple generations. Recently, the application of innovative genome engineering techniques, particularly CRISPR-Cas9-based systems, has opened up new avenues that offer the prospects of sustainable farming in the modern agricultural industry. In addition, the emergence of novel editing systems has enabled the development of transgene-free non-genetically modified plants, which represent a suitable option for improving desired traits in a range of crop plants. To date, a number of disease-resistant crops have been produced using gene-editing tools, which can make a significant contribution to overcoming disease-related problems. Not only does this directly minimize yield losses but also reduces the reliance on pesticide application, thereby enhancing crop productivity that can meet the globally increasing demand for food. In this review, we describe recent progress in genome engineering techniques, particularly CRISPR-Cas9 systems, in development of disease-resistant crop plants. In addition, we describe the role of CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in sustainable agriculture.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas systemdisease resistancegenome editingpesticideplant pathogen

Identifiers

PMID35371164
PMCPMC8968944
OpenAlexW4220884262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.