Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370993›Full record

Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2022

A Model for Predicting Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Using Serum AMH, Menstrual Cycle Length, Body Mass Index and Serum Androstenedione in Chinese Reproductive Aged Population: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Huiyu Xu, Guoshuang Feng, Kannan Alpadi, Yong Han, Rui Yang, Lixue Chen, Rong Li, Jie Qiao

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Huiyu XuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guoshuang FengCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children's Health, Beijing, China.
Kannan AlpadiThe Predict Health, Houston, TX, United States.
Yong HanHangzhou Qingguo Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Hangzhou, China.
Rui YangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lixue ChenCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Rong LiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie QiaoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNCapital Medical University · CNNational Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases · CNPeking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A clinical diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) can be tedious with many different required tests and examinations. Furthermore, women with PCOS have increased risks for several metabolic complications, which need long-term health management. Therefore, we attempted to establish an easily applicable model to identify such women at an early stage. Objective: To develop an easy-to-use tool for screening PCOS based on medical records from a large assisted reproductive technology (ART) center in China. Materials and Methods: A retrospective observational cohort from Peking University Third Hospital was used in the study. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression with 10-fold cross-validation was applied to construct the model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity values were used to evaluate and compare the models. Design Setting and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 21,219 ovarian stimulation cycle records from January to December 2019 in Peking University Third Hospital. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was whether there was a clinical diagnosis of PCOS. The independent variables included were age, body mass index (BMI), upper limit of menstrual cycle length (UML), basal serum levels of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), testosterone androstenedione, antral follicle counts et al. Results: We have established a new mathematical model for diagnosing PCOS using serum AMH and androstenedione levels, UML, and BMI, with AUC values of 0.855 (0.838-0.870), 0.848 (0.791-0.891), 0.846 (0.812-0.875) in the training, validation, and testing sets, respectively. The contribution of each predictor to this model were: AMH 41.2%; UML 35.2%; BMI 4.3%; and androstenedione 3.7%. The top 10 groups of women most predicted to develop PCOS were demonstrated. An online tool (http://121.43.113.123:8888/) has been developed to assist Chinese ART clinics. Conclusions: The models and online tool we established here might be helpful for screening and identifying women with undiagnosed PCOS in Asian populations and could assist in the long-term management of related metabolic disorders.

Indexed as

AndrostenedioneAnti-Mullerian HormonePolycystic Ovary SyndromeAdultBody Mass IndexChinaFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleRetrospective StudiesAndrostenedioneAnti-Mullerian HormoneAMHandrostenedioneBMImenstrual cycle lengthPCOSwebsite-based tool

Identifiers

PMID35370993
PMCPMC8970043
OpenAlexW4221125322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.