Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370911›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2022

Systematic Review - Combining Neuroprotection With Reperfusion in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

E M Vos, V J Geraedts, A van der Lugt, D W J Dippel, M J H Wermer, J Hofmeijer, A C G M van Es, Y B W E M Roos, C M P C D Peeters-Scholte, I R van den Wijngaard

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Role of intravenous alteplase on late lesion growth and clinical outcome after stroke treatment.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The pioneering past and cutting-edge future of interventional neuroradiology.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. The case for neuregulin-1 as a clinical treatment for stroke.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

E M VosDepartment of Neurology, The Hague Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.
V J GeraedtsDepartment of Neurology, The Hague Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.
A van der LugtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
D W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
M J H WermerDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
J HofmeijerDepartment of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands.
A C G M van EsDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Y B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
C M P C D Peeters-ScholteDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
I R van den WijngaardDepartment of Neurology, The Hague Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLErasmus MC · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLRijnstate Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical trials of neuroprotection in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have provided disappointing results. Reperfusion may be a necessary condition for positive effects of neuroprotective treatments. This systematic review provides an overview of efficacy of neuroprotective agents in combination with reperfusion therapy in AIS. Methods: A literature search was performed on the following databases, namely PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare. All databases were searched up to September 23rd 2021. All randomized controlled trials in which patients were treated with neuroprotective strategies within 12 h of stroke onset in combination with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), endovascular therapy (EVT), or both were included. Results: We screened 1,764 titles/abstracts and included 30 full reports of unique studies with a total of 16,160 patients. In 15 studies neuroprotectants were tested for clinical efficacy, where all patients had to receive reperfusion therapies, either IVT and/or EVT. Heterogeneity in reported outcome measures was observed. Treatment was associated with improved clinical outcome for: 1) uric acid in patients treated with EVT and IVT, 2) nerinetide in patients who underwent EVT without IVT, 3) imatinib in stroke patients treated with IVT with or without EVT, 4) remote ischemic perconditioning and IVT, and 5) high-flow normobaric oxygen treatment after EVT, with or without IVT. Conclusion: Studies specifically testing effects of neuroprotective agents in addition to IVT and/or EVT are scarce. Future neuroprotection studies should report standardized functional outcome measures and combine neuroprotective agents with reperfusion therapies in AIS or aim to include prespecified subgroup analyses for treatment with IVT and/or EVT.

Indexed as

intravenous thrombolysisneuroprotectionreperfusion after ischemiastrokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID35370911
PMCPMC8969766
OpenAlexW4221024629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.