Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370908›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Interictal EEG and ECG for SUDEP Risk Assessment: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

Zhe Sage Chen, Aaron Hsieh, Guanghao Sun, Gregory K Bergey, Samuel F Berkovic, Piero Perucca, Wendyl D'Souza, Christopher J Elder, Pue Farooque, Emily L Johnson and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electrocardiographic abnormalities in epilepsy: analysis of cardiac conduction patterns and SUDEP Risk.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhe Sage ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Aaron HsiehTandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Guanghao SunDepartment of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Gregory K BergeyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Samuel F BerkovicDepartment of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Piero PeruccaDepartment of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Wendyl D'SouzaDepartment of Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Christopher J ElderDivision of Epilepsy and Sleep, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Pue FarooqueYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Emily L JohnsonJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Sarah BarnardDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Russell NightscalesDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Patrick KwanDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Brian MoseleyClinical Development Neurocrine Biosciences Inc., San Diego, CA, United States.
Terence J O'BrienDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Shobi SivathambooDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Juliana LazeComprehensive Epilepsy Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.
Daniel FriedmanDepartment of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Orrin DevinskyNeuroscience Institute, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
MS-BioS Study Group
New York University · USUniversity of Melbourne · AUJohns Hopkins Medicine · USNYU Langone Health · USAlfred Health · AUColumbia University · USMonash University · AUNeurocrine Biosciences (United States) · USSt Vincent's Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUYale University · US

Funding

Machine learning approaches for improving EEG data utility in SUDEP researchR01NS123928 · NINDS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DEVINSKY, ORRIN, FRIEDMAN, DANIEL · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the leading cause of epilepsy-related mortality. Although lots of effort has been made in identifying clinical risk factors for SUDEP in the literature, there are few validated methods to predict individual SUDEP risk. Prolonged postictal EEG suppression (PGES) is a potential SUDEP biomarker, but its occurrence is infrequent and requires epilepsy monitoring unit admission. We use machine learning methods to examine SUDEP risk using interictal EEG and ECG recordings from SUDEP cases and matched living epilepsy controls. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, cohort study examined interictal EEG and ECG recordings from 30 SUDEP cases and 58 age-matched living epilepsy patient controls. We trained machine learning models with interictal EEG and ECG features to predict the retrospective SUDEP risk for each patient. We assessed cross-validated classification accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve. Results: The logistic regression (LR) classifier produced the overall best performance, outperforming the support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and convolutional neural network (CNN). Among the 30 patients with SUDEP [14 females; mean age (SD), 31 (8.47) years] and 58 living epilepsy controls [26 females (43%); mean age (SD) 31 (8.5) years], the LR model achieved the median AUC of 0.77 [interquartile range (IQR), 0.73-0.80] in five-fold cross-validation using interictal alpha and low gamma power ratio of the EEG and heart rate variability (HRV) features extracted from the ECG. The LR model achieved the mean AUC of 0.79 in leave-one-center-out prediction. Conclusions: Our results support that machine learning-driven models may quantify SUDEP risk for epilepsy patients, future refinements in our model may help predict individualized SUDEP risk and help clinicians correlate predictive scores with the clinical data. Low-cost and noninvasive interictal biomarkers of SUDEP risk may help clinicians to identify high-risk patients and initiate preventive strategies.

Indexed as

biomarkerECGEEGmachine learningSUDEP

Identifiers

PMID35370908
PMCPMC8973318
OpenAlexW4220659071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.