ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Evaluation of Intracranial Hypertension in Patients With Hypertensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Using Texture Analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Texture analysis based on clinical images had been widely used in neurological diseases. This study aimed to achieve depth information of computed tomography (CT) images by texture analysis and to establish a model for noninvasive evaluation of intracranial pressure (ICP) in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (HICH). Methods: Forty-seven patients with HICH were selected. Related CT images and ICP value were collected. The morphological features of hematoma volume, midline shift, and ventriculocranial ratio were measured. Forty textural features were extracted from regions of interest. Four models were established to predict intracranial hypertension with morphological features, textural features of anterior horn, textural features of temporal lobe, and textural features of posterior horn. Results: Model of posterior horn had the highest ability to predict intracranial hypertension (AUC = 0.90, F1 score = 0.72), followed by model of anterior horn (AUC = 0.70, F1 score = 0.53) and model of temporal lobe (AUC = 0.70, F1 score = 0.58), and model of morphological features displayed the worst performance (AUC = 0.42, F1 score = 0.38). Conclusion: Texture analysis can realize interpretation of CT images in depth, which has great potential in noninvasive evaluation of intracranial hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.