Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370806›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Acceptability of Peer Support for People With Schizophrenia in Chennai, India: A Cross Sectional Study Amongst People With Lived Experience, Caregivers, and Mental Health Professionals.

Sonia Sims, S Hepsipa Omega Juliet, Jainey Joseph, Subhashini Gopal, Vijaya Raghavan, Lakshmi Venkatraman, Ramachandran Padmavati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Real-world comprehensive care of people living with schizophrenia: recommendations across different settings and clinical stages.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Does theGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonia SimsDepartment of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
S Hepsipa Omega JulietDepartment of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Jainey JosephDepartment of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Subhashini GopalDepartment of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Vijaya RaghavanDepartment of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Lakshmi VenkatramanDepartment of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Ramachandran PadmavatiDepartment of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, Schizophrenia Research Foundation, Chennai, India.
Schizophrenia Research Foundation · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Establishing structured peer support in mental health, particularly for people with schizophrenia, as a psychosocial intervention is early in low and middle-income countries like India. Before implementing and understanding the effectiveness of peer support service and which mode of peer support delivery will be suitable for our culture, our study aimed to understand if peer support would be accepted by the different participants like persons with schizophrenia, caregivers and mental health professionals in a tertiary care center in Chennai, India. Methods: The study was conducted at the outpatient department (OPD) of a tertiary psychiatric care facility in Chennai, India. A cross-sectional study method was used. Consecutive persons diagnosed with schizophrenia and caregivers of persons with schizophrenia, who attended the outpatient department, and mental health professionals within and outside the facility who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria participated in the study. A structured questionnaire purposefully developed for the study was administered to the different study participants. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Categorical variables were expressed as frequency and percentages, while the continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Results: A total of 155 participants (52 persons with schizophrenia, 50 caregivers and 53 mental health professionals) completed the survey. The majority of the participants (90.4% of persons with schizophrenia, 86% caregivers and all mental health professionals) welcomed peer support interventions. The participants wanted peers to help persons with schizophrenia achieve personal goals to enhance their mental health and day to day living with an emphasis on independent living and interpersonal and social relationships and help them achieve medication and treatment-related goals toward recovery. Understanding the role of a peer support volunteer and transitioning from a "person with schizophrenia" to a "peer support volunteer" by persons with schizophrenia was thought most challenging. Conclusion: The results highlight the potential acceptability of peer support across several stakeholders in the care of schizophrenia in a low and middle-income country context. The results may guide the implementation of a peer support volunteer programme as an essential mechanism of delivering psychosocial interventions for persons with schizophrenia.

Indexed as

acceptabilitypeer supportpeer support programpeer support volunteerpsychosocial interventionschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID35370806
PMCPMC8965369
OpenAlexW4220926704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.