ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2022
A Deep Learning-Based Workflow for Dendritic Spine Segmentation.
Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Curvature-based machine-learning method for automated segmentation of dendritic spines.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- SynAPSeg: A novel dataset and image analysis framework for deep learning-based synapse detection and quantification.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- SynAPSeg: A novel dataset and image analysis framework for deep learning-based synapse detection and quantification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
- CURVATURE-BASED MACHINE LEARNING METHOD FOR AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION OF DENDRITIC SPINES.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Frenet-Serret Frame-Based Decomposition for Part Segmentation of 3-D Curvilinear Structures.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- SpyDen: simplifying molecular and structural analysis across spines and dendrites.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- 2dSpAn-Auto: an automated tool for analysis of two-dimensional dendritic spine images.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Structural neural plasticity evoked by rapid-acting antidepressant interventions.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Super-resolution microscopy and deep learning methods: what can they bring to neuroscience: from neuron to 3D spine segmentation.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2025Review
- Quantifying morphologies of developing neuronal cells using deep learning with imperfect annotations.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2024Article
- DeepD3, an open framework for automated quantification of dendritic spines.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Between neurons and networks: investigating mesoscale brain connectivity in neurological and psychiatric disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024Review
- Utilizing 2D-region-based CNNs for automatic dendritic spine detection in 3D live cell imaging.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The morphological analysis of dendritic spines is an important challenge for the neuroscientific community. Most state-of-the-art techniques rely on user-supervised algorithms to segment the spine surface, especially those designed for light microscopy images. Therefore, processing large dendritic branches is costly and time-consuming. Although deep learning (DL) models have become one of the most commonly used tools in image segmentation, they have not yet been successfully applied to this problem. In this article, we study the feasibility of using DL models to automatize spine segmentation from confocal microscopy images. Supervised learning is the most frequently used method for training DL models. This approach requires large data sets of high-quality segmented images (ground truth). As mentioned above, the segmentation of microscopy images is time-consuming and, therefore, in most cases, neuroanatomists only reconstruct relevant branches of the stack. Additionally, some parts of the dendritic shaft and spines are not segmented due to dyeing problems. In the context of this research, we tested the most successful architectures in the DL biomedical segmentation field. To build the ground truth, we used a large and high-quality data set, according to standards in the field. Nevertheless, this data set is not sufficient to train convolutional neural networks for accurate reconstructions. Therefore, we implemented an automatic preprocessing step and several training strategies to deal with the problems mentioned above. As shown by our results, our system produces a high-quality segmentation in most cases. Finally, we integrated several postprocessing user-supervised algorithms in a graphical user interface application to correct any possible artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.