Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370569›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroanatomy2022

A Deep Learning-Based Workflow for Dendritic Spine Segmentation.

Isabel Vidaurre-Gallart, Isabel Fernaud-Espinosa, Nicusor Cosmin-Toader, Lidia Talavera-Martínez, Miguel Martin-Abadal, Ruth Benavides-Piccione, Yolanda Gonzalez-Cid, Luis Pastor, Javier DeFelipe, Marcos García-Lorenzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroanatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isabel Vidaurre-GallartVG-LAB, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain.
Isabel Fernaud-EspinosaInstituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Nicusor Cosmin-ToaderVG-LAB, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain.
Lidia Talavera-MartínezDepartament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain.
Miguel Martin-AbadalDepartament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain.
Ruth Benavides-PiccioneInstituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Yolanda Gonzalez-CidDepartament de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma, Spain.
Luis PastorVG-LAB, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain.
Javier DeFelipeInstituto Cajal, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Marcos García-LorenzoVG-LAB, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The morphological analysis of dendritic spines is an important challenge for the neuroscientific community. Most state-of-the-art techniques rely on user-supervised algorithms to segment the spine surface, especially those designed for light microscopy images. Therefore, processing large dendritic branches is costly and time-consuming. Although deep learning (DL) models have become one of the most commonly used tools in image segmentation, they have not yet been successfully applied to this problem. In this article, we study the feasibility of using DL models to automatize spine segmentation from confocal microscopy images. Supervised learning is the most frequently used method for training DL models. This approach requires large data sets of high-quality segmented images (ground truth). As mentioned above, the segmentation of microscopy images is time-consuming and, therefore, in most cases, neuroanatomists only reconstruct relevant branches of the stack. Additionally, some parts of the dendritic shaft and spines are not segmented due to dyeing problems. In the context of this research, we tested the most successful architectures in the DL biomedical segmentation field. To build the ground truth, we used a large and high-quality data set, according to standards in the field. Nevertheless, this data set is not sufficient to train convolutional neural networks for accurate reconstructions. Therefore, we implemented an automatic preprocessing step and several training strategies to deal with the problems mentioned above. As shown by our results, our system produces a high-quality segmentation in most cases. Finally, we integrated several postprocessing user-supervised algorithms in a graphical user interface application to correct any possible artifacts.

Indexed as

artificial neural networkautomatic 3D image segmentationconfocal microscopypyramidal cellsreconstruction algorithms

Identifiers

PMID35370569
PMCPMC8967951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.