Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370436›Full record

ArticleAtmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994)2022

Unexpected rise of atmospheric secondary aerosols from biomass burning during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Hangzhou, China.

Huifeng Xu, Linghong Chen, Jiansong Chen, Zhier Bao, Chenxi Wang, Xiang Gao, Kefa Cen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Atmospheric environment (Oxford, England : 1994), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huifeng XuState Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Linghong ChenState Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Jiansong ChenHangzhou Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, 310007, China.
Zhier BaoState Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Chenxi WangState Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Xiang GaoState Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Kefa CenState Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After the global outbreak of COVID-19, the Chinese government took many measures to control the spread of the virus. The measures led to a reduction in anthropogenic emissions nationwide. Data from a single particle aerosol mass spectrometer in an eastern Chinese megacity (Hangzhou) before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdown (5 January to February 29, 2020) was used to understand the effect lockdown had on atmospheric particles. The collected single particle mass spectra were clustered into eight categories. Before the lockdown, the proportions of particles ranked in order of: EC (57.9%) < K-SN (13.6%) < Fe-rich (10.2%) < ECOC (6.7%) < K-Na (6.6%) < OC (3.4%) < K-Pb (1.0%) < K-Al (0.7%). During the lockdown period, the EC and Fe-rich particles decreased by 42.8% and 93.2% compared to before lockdown due to reduced vehicle exhaust and industrial activity. By contrast, the K-SN and K-Na particles containing biomass burning tracers increased by 155.2% and 45.2% during the same time, respectively. During the lockdown, the proportions of particles ranked in order of: K-SN (39.7%) < EC (38.1%) < K-Na (11.0%) < ECOC (7.7%) < OC (1.2%) < K-Pb (0.9%) < Fe-rich (0.8%) < K-Al (0.6%). Back trajectory analysis indicated that both inland (Anhui and Shandong provinces) and marine transported air masses may have contributed to the increase in K-SN and K-Na particles during the lockdown, and that increased number of fugitive combustion points (i.e., household fuel, biomass combustion) was a contributing factor. Therefore, the results imply that regional synergistic control measures on fugitive combustion emissions are needed to ensure good air quality.

Indexed as

Biomass burningCOVID-19Regional atmospheric transportSPAMSYRD

Identifiers

PMID35370436
PMCPMC8958265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.