Hong Kong, the Virus and Illiberalism: Between Flattening the Curve and an Authoritarian Slide?

Can the pandemic measures be used to advance particular political means? The question of correlation between illiberal legal changes adopted amongst the wave of legislation focused on battling COVID has arisen in a number of countries around the world; as an increasing number of states finds leaving restrictions behind in 2022, however, Hong Kong is still battling the Omicron wave of the pandemic. Ever since its transition to China in 1997, Hong Kong has retained its place on the world stage as an international business hub and, while getting closer to the Mainland, enjoyed the freedoms provided by its SAR status. At the same time, by the end of the second decade of the twenty-first century the tensions between the pro-democratic inclinations of the large part of the city's population and pro-Mainland disposition of the SAR's political elite began to rise, with proposals of various legal acts put forward by the local government often perceived as encroaching freedoms. The street-level 'standoff' between the authorities and the people was brought to a halt by the COVID-19 pandemic; and, with protesting rendered virtually impossible, a number of controversial legal changes were introduced by the government taking advantage of the situation, which, together with the anti-pandemic measures have continued to negatively impact the city's financial hub status. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the correlation between Hong Kong's fight with the pandemic and the local government's taking advantage of the situation in order to implement illiberal legislation, and its aftermath.