Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370319›Full record

ArticleJournal of multivariate analysis2022

Inference in Functional Linear Quantile Regression.

Meng Li, Kehui Wang, Arnab Maity, Ana-Maria Staicu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multivariate analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On function-on-function linear quantile regression.Journal of applied statistics · 2025
    Article
  4. Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Functional Data with Application to Feed Intake of Lactating Sows.Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Robust scalar-on-function partial quantile regression.Journal of applied statistics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Quantile Function on Scalar Regression Analysis for Distributional Data.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Meng LiDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX.
Kehui WangPPD Inc, Morrisville, NC.
Arnab MaityDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Ana-Maria StaicuDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVIDIAN, MARIE, KOSOROK, MICHAEL R · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we study statistical inference in functional quantile regression for scalar response and a functional covariate. Specifically, we consider a functional linear quantile regression model where the effect of the covariate on the quantile of the response is modeled through the inner product between the functional covariate and an unknown smooth regression parameter function that varies with the level of quantile. The objective is to test that the regression parameter is constant across several quantile levels of interest. The parameter function is estimated by combining ideas from functional principal component analysis and quantile regression. An adjusted Wald testing procedure is proposed for this hypothesis of interest, and its chi-square asymptotic null distribution is derived. The testing procedure is investigated numerically in simulations involving sparse and noisy functional covariates and in a capital bike share data application. The proposed approach is easy to implement and the R code is published online at https://github.com/xylimeng/fQR-testing.

Indexed as

Composite quantile regressionFunctional principal component analysisFunctional quantile regressionMeasurement errorPrimary 62G08Secondary 62H15Wald test

Identifiers

PMID35370319
PMCPMC8975129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.