Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35370254›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2022

Clinical Impact of Circulating Galectin-3 on Ventricular Arrhythmias and Heart Failure Hospitalization Independent of Prior Ventricular Arrhythmic Events in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillators.

Hisaki Makimoto, Patrick Müller, Kullmann Denise, Lukas Clasen, Tina Lin, Stephan Angendohr, Jan Schmidt, Christoph Brinkmeyer, Malte Kelm, Alexandru Bejinariu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sudden cardiac death in stable coronary artery disease: A literature review.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hisaki MakimotoDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Patrick MüllerDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Kullmann DeniseDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Lukas ClasenDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Tina LinGenesisCare, Victoria, Australia.
Stephan AngendohrDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Jan SchmidtDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Christoph BrinkmeyerDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Malte KelmDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Alexandru BejinariuDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective For risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in patients with structural heart disease, more precise predictors in addition to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are clinically needed. The present study assessed the utility of galectin-3 as an independent indicator for the prognosis of heart failure patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). Methods The study population consisted of 91 consecutive patients who underwent a routine ICD checkup in our ICD outpatient clinic. Circulating galectin-3 was assessed using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. The enrolled patients were prospectively followed. The primary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of appropriate ICD therapy (AIT), and the secondary endpoint was defined as the occurrence of unplanned overnight hospitalization due to decompensated heart failure (dHF). Results During a mean follow-up of 472±107 days, AIT occurred in 18 patients (20%). Unplanned hospitalizations due to dHF were noted in 12 patients (13%). A receiver-operative characteristics analysis demonstrated a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 68% for AIT occurrences with a galectin-3 cut-off value of 13.1 ng/mL (area under the curve =0.82). A Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients with galectin-3 >13.1 ng/mL had significantly higher incidences of AIT as compared to those with lower galectin-3 (log-rank, p<0.001). This significance was also observed in both subgroup analyses with ischemic and non-ischemic etiology. Cox regression demonstrated that higher galectin-3 was an independent predictor of AIT and dHF, even after adjusting for previous arrhythmic events. Conclusion The circulating galectin-3 level can be used as a clinical indicator of subsequent occurrence of ventricular arrhythmic events and decompensated heart failure, regardless of a history of ventricular arrhythmias.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableHeart FailureArrhythmias, CardiacGalectin 3HospitalizationHumansStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftGalectin 3galectin-3heart failureimplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorischemic cardiomyopathynon-ischemic cardiomyopathyventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID35370254
PMCPMC9038450
OpenAlexW4220989910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.